Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 838.021 (2025)
Corruption by threat against public servant.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
838.021 Corruption by threat against public servant.—
(1) It is unlawful to harm or threaten to harm any public servant, his or her immediate family, or any other person with whose welfare the public servant is interested with the intent to:
(a) Influence the performance of any act or omission that the person believes to be, or that the public servant represents as being, within the official discretion of the public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty.
(b) Cause or induce the public servant to use or exert, or procure the use or exertion of, any influence upon or with any other public servant regarding any act or omission that the person believes to be, or that the public servant represents as being, within the official discretion of the public servant, in violation of a public duty, or in performance of a public duty.
(2) Prosecution under this section shall not require any allegation or proof that the public servant ultimately sought to be unlawfully influenced was qualified to act in the desired way, that the public servant had assumed office, that the matter was properly pending before him or her or might by law properly be brought before him or her, that the public servant possessed jurisdiction over the matter, or that his or her official action was necessary to achieve the person’s purpose.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 838.021
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§838.021(3a)CRIMES AGAINST PERSONHARM PUBLIC SERVANT OR FAMILY
§838.021(3b)CRIMES AGAINST PERSONCORRUPT BY THREAT PUBLIC SERVANT OR FAMILY
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases, 1980–2020 · leading case: Reilly v. Florida, Dep't of Corr., 847 F. Supp. 951 (M.D. Fla. 1994).
Reilly v. Florida, Dep't of Corr., 847 F. Supp. 951 (M.D. Fla. 1994). “The issues raised on appeal included: (1) Section 838.021, Florida Statutes was unconstitutional; (2) Section 836.”
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2012-04, 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013). “12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). “We affirm Appellant’s conviction for corruption by threat under section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1997).”
Miller v. State, 667 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). “Sufficiency of allegations as to count III Section 838.021, Florida Statutes, states, Corruption by threat against public servant.”
State v. Slaughter, 574 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). “The state appeals an order dismissing with prejudice an information charging that appellee unlawfully threatened unlawful harm to a public servant, to wit: a circuit judge, with the intent to influence said public servant in the performance of his public duty in violation of…”
In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2017-09., 238 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2018). “12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
Smith v. State, 532 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). “(1987) and § 838.021(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). [2] For example, some of the letters were signed "Oscar Wilde," a reference to the playwright's satirical aversion to lawyers.”
Pagano v. State, 387 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1980). “Defendant was charged by information with corruption by threat under section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1977), for allegedly threatening harm to a police officer and his family for the purpose of avoiding arrest.”
Bragg v. State, 475 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). “* * * * * * § 838.021, Fla. Stat. In this case, there was no evidence that appellant did anything to corruptly influence the deputy.”
Teele v. State, 954 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). “The elements of the crime of corruption by threat against a public servant are set out in section 838.021, Florida Statutes (2004).”
Lanier v. State, 983 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). “078, Florida Statutes (2002), and threatening a public servant, in violation of section 838.021, Florida Statutes (2002).”
In the Interest of P.J., 579 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). “On cross-examination, the officer acknowledged that the threats were made while appellant was under arrest and handcuffed, but the officer took the threats to his person seriously, notwithstanding the handcuffs.”
— 838.021(1) — 1 case
State v. Hart, 677 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
— 838.021(1)(a) — 1 case
Harrison v. State, 641 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
— 838.021(2) — 2 cases
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2012-04, 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013). “12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2017-09., 238 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2018). “12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
— 838.021(3)(B) — 1 case
Teele v. State, 954 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). “The elements of the crime of corruption by threat against a public servant are set out in section 838.021, Florida Statutes (2004).”
— 838.021(3)(a) — 4 cases
Miller v. State, 667 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). “Sufficiency of allegations as to count III Section 838.021, Florida Statutes, states, Corruption by threat against public servant.”
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2012-04, 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013). “12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
In Re: Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2017-09., 238 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2018). “12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
Harrison v. State, 641 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).
— 838.021(3)(b) — 8 cases
Smith v. State, 532 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). “(1987) and § 838.021(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). [2] For example, some of the letters were signed "Oscar Wilde," a reference to the playwright's satirical aversion to lawyers.”
State v. Slaughter, 574 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). “The state appeals an order dismissing with prejudice an information charging that appellee unlawfully threatened unlawful harm to a public servant, to wit: a circuit judge, with the intent to influence said public servant in the performance of his public duty in violation of…”
Miller v. State, 667 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). “Sufficiency of allegations as to count III Section 838.021, Florida Statutes, states, Corruption by threat against public servant.”
Teele v. State, 954 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). “The elements of the crime of corruption by threat against a public servant are set out in section 838.021, Florida Statutes (2004).”
Rankin v. State, 620 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
— 838.021(l)(a) — 4 cases
Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). “We affirm Appellant’s conviction for corruption by threat under section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1997).”
In the Interest of P.J., 579 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). “On cross-examination, the officer acknowledged that the threats were made while appellant was under arrest and handcuffed, but the officer took the threats to his person seriously, notwithstanding the handcuffs.”
Johnson v. State, 185 So. 3d 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).
P.B. v. State, 95 So. 3d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.