Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 838.021
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§838.021(3a)CRIMES AGAINST PERSONHARM PUBLIC SERVANT OR FAMILYF · 2nd
§838.021(3b)CRIMES AGAINST PERSONCORRUPT BY THREAT PUBLIC SERVANT OR FAMILYF · 3rd
Notes of Decisions
Reilly v. Florida, Dep't of Corr., 847 F. Supp. 951 (M.D. Fla. 1994).
· cites it 27× “The issues raised on appeal included: (1) Section 838.021, Florida Statutes was unconstitutional; (2) Section 836.”
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2012-04, 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013).
· cites it 5× “12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
· cites it 4× “We affirm Appellant’s conviction for corruption by threat under section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1997).”
Miller v. State, 667 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
· cites it 5× “Sufficiency of allegations as to count III Section 838.021, Florida Statutes, states, Corruption by threat against public servant.”
State v. Slaughter, 574 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
· cites it 8× “The state appeals an order dismissing with prejudice an information charging that appellee unlawfully threatened unlawful harm to a public servant, to wit: a circuit judge, with the intent to influence said public servant in the performance of his public duty in violation of…”
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2017-09., 238 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2018).
· cites it 5× “12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
Smith v. State, 532 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
· cites it 4× “(1987) and § 838.021(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). [2] For example, some of the letters were signed "Oscar Wilde," a reference to the playwright's satirical aversion to lawyers.”
Pagano v. State, 387 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 1980).
· cites it 6× “Defendant was charged by information with corruption by threat under section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1977), for allegedly threatening harm to a police officer and his family for the purpose of avoiding arrest.”
Bragg v. State, 475 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
· cites it 6× “* * * * * * § 838.021, Fla. Stat. In this case, there was no evidence that appellant did anything to corruptly influence the deputy.”
Teele v. State, 954 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
· cites it 10× “The elements of the crime of corruption by threat against a public servant are set out in section 838.021, Florida Statutes (2004).”
Lanier v. State, 983 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
· cites it 2× “078, Florida Statutes (2002), and threatening a public servant, in violation of section 838.021, Florida Statutes (2002).”
In the Interest of P.J., 579 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
· cites it 3× “On cross-examination, the officer acknowledged that the threats were made while appellant was under arrest and handcuffed, but the officer took the threats to his person seriously, notwithstanding the handcuffs.”
838.021(1): 1 case
838.021(1)(a): 1 case
838.021(2): 2 cases
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2012-04, 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013).
“12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2017-09., 238 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2018).
“12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
838.021(3)(B): 1 case
Teele v. State, 954 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
“The elements of the crime of corruption by threat against a public servant are set out in section 838.021, Florida Statutes (2004).”
838.021(3)(a): 4 cases
Miller v. State, 667 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
“Sufficiency of allegations as to count III Section 838.021, Florida Statutes, states, Corruption by threat against public servant.”
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report No. 2012-04, 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013).
“12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
In re Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases-Report 2017-09., 238 So. 3d 192 (Fla. 2018).
“12 CORRUPTION BY [HARM] [THREAT OF HARM] AGAINST A PUBLIC SERVANT § 838.021, Fla. Stat. To prove the crime of Corruption by [Harm] [Threat of Harm] Against a Public Servant, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1.”
838.021(3)(b): 8 cases
Smith v. State, 532 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
“(1987) and § 838.021(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). [2] For example, some of the letters were signed "Oscar Wilde," a reference to the playwright's satirical aversion to lawyers.”
State v. Slaughter, 574 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
“The state appeals an order dismissing with prejudice an information charging that appellee unlawfully threatened unlawful harm to a public servant, to wit: a circuit judge, with the intent to influence said public servant in the performance of his public duty in violation of…”
Miller v. State, 667 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
“Sufficiency of allegations as to count III Section 838.021, Florida Statutes, states, Corruption by threat against public servant.”
Teele v. State, 954 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
“The elements of the crime of corruption by threat against a public servant are set out in section 838.021, Florida Statutes (2004).”
838.021(l)(a): 4 cases
Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
“We affirm Appellant’s conviction for corruption by threat under section 838.021, Florida Statutes (1997).”
In the Interest of P.J., 579 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
“On cross-examination, the officer acknowledged that the threats were made while appellant was under arrest and handcuffed, but the officer took the threats to his person seriously, notwithstanding the handcuffs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.