Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 877.16 (2025)
Exhibition of deformed animals prohibited; penalty.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
877.16 Exhibition of deformed animals prohibited; penalty.—Whoever shall exhibit for pay or compensation any crippled or physically distorted, malformed, or disfigured beast, bird, or animal in any circus, show, or similar place, or any other place to which an admission fee is charged, whoever knowingly advertises or knowingly causes to be advertised any such exhibition, and whoever solicits or procures the attendance of others at such exhibition with knowledge of the nature thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
Note.—Former s. 867.02.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 877.16
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§877.16CONSERVATION-ANIMALSRENUMBERED. SEE REC #10655
§877.16ANIMAL CRUELTYEXHIBIT DEFORMED ANIMALS
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1982–1984 · leading case: Gardner v. Johnson, 451 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1984).
Gardner v. Johnson, 451 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 1984). “This case is before us on direct appeal from a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal which affirmed the trial court's determination that section 877.16, Florida Statutes (1979), is unconstitutional.”
Gardner v. Johnson, 429 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). “This is an appeal from the holding by the trial court that section 877.16, Florida Statutes (1979), is unconstitutionally vague and, therefore, void.”
Johnson v. Gardner, 1 Fla. Supp. 2d 121 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Manatee Cty. 1982). “Plaintiff, RICHARD JOHNSON, sought to prohibit enforcement of Section 877.16, Florida Statutes, 1981. This Section of the Statutes declares it to be a second degree misdemeanor to exhibit for pay any “crippled or physically distorted, malformed, or disfigured beast, bird, or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.