Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 916.1081 (2025)
Escape from program; penalty.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
916.1081 Escape from program; penalty.—
(1) A forensic client who is involuntarily committed to the department or agency, who is in the custody of the department or agency, and who escapes or attempts to escape from a civil or forensic facility commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) A person who is involuntarily committed to the department or the agency, who is in the custody of the Department of Corrections, and who escapes or attempts to escape from a facility or program commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Any punishment of imprisonment imposed under this subsection shall run consecutive to any former sentence imposed upon the person.
Note.—Former s. 916.175.
Arrestable Offenses under F.S. 916.1081
M = misdemeanor · F = felony · degree: F=1st S=2nd T=3rd§916.1081(2)ESCAPECOMMITTED PERSON ESCAPE ATTEMPT FACIL PROGRAM
§916.1081ESCAPEFORENSIC CLIENT ESCAPE ATTEMPT FACILITY
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2018–2018 · leading case: Charles Vansmith v. State of Florida, 247 So. 3d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).
Charles Vansmith v. State of Florida, 247 So. 3d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). “See § 916.1081(2), Fla. Stat. (2006-2017). A well-known rule of statutory construction is that the Legislature is presumed to know the statutes that are in existence 3 at the time it enacts new legislation.”
— 916.1081(2) — 1 case
Charles Vansmith v. State of Florida, 247 So. 3d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). “See § 916.1081(2), Fla. Stat. (2006-2017). A well-known rule of statutory construction is that the Legislature is presumed to know the statutes that are in existence 3 at the time it enacts new legislation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.