Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 925.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 925.12 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 925.12

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 925
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 925.12
925.12 DNA testing; defendants entering pleas.
(1) For defendants who have entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony on or after July 1, 2006, a defendant may petition for postsentencing DNA testing under s. 925.11 under the following circumstances:
(a) The facts on which the petition is predicated were unknown to the petitioner or the petitioner’s attorney at the time the plea was entered and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence; or
(b) The physical evidence for which DNA testing is sought was not disclosed to the defense by the state prior to the entry of the plea by the petitioner.
(2) For defendants seeking to enter a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony on or after July 1, 2006, the court shall inquire of the defendant and of counsel for the defendant and the state as to physical evidence containing DNA known to exist that could exonerate the defendant prior to accepting a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. If no physical evidence containing DNA that could exonerate the defendant is known to exist, the court may proceed with consideration of accepting the plea. If physical evidence containing DNA that could exonerate the defendant is known to exist, the court may postpone the proceeding on the defendant’s behalf and order DNA testing upon motion of counsel specifying the physical evidence to be tested.
(3) It is the intent of the Legislature that the Supreme Court adopt rules of procedure consistent with this section for a court, prior to the acceptance of a plea, to make an inquiry into the following matters:
(a) Whether counsel for the defense has reviewed the discovery disclosed by the state and whether such discovery included a listing or description of physical items of evidence.
(b) Whether the nature of the evidence against the defendant disclosed through discovery has been reviewed with the defendant.
(c) Whether the defendant or counsel for the defendant is aware of any physical evidence disclosed by the state for which DNA testing may exonerate the defendant.
(d) Whether the state is aware of any physical evidence for which DNA testing may exonerate the defendant.
(4) It is the intent of the Legislature that the postponement of the proceedings by the court on the defendant’s behalf under subsection (2) constitute an extension attributable to the defendant for purposes of the defendant’s right to a speedy trial.
History.s. 2, ch. 2006-292.

F.S. 925.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 925.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 925.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 925.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 925.12.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 925.12

Total Results: 5

Cardona v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-02-06

Citation: 109 So. 3d 241, 2013 WL 440143

Snippet: procedures for testing pursuant to sections 925.11 and 925.12. Section 925.11(l)(a)l. allows the defendant to

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure-Rule 3.191

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-06-09

Citation: 66 So. 3d 851, 2011 WL 2224840

Snippet: physical evidence to be tested pursuant to section 925.12(2), Florida Statutes, and for trial of other pending

In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-11-19

Citation: 26 So. 3d 534, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 629, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1948

Snippet: *536 the defendant's behalf pursuant to section 925.12(2), Florida Statutes (2009). As to this rule, we

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-03-29

Citation: 953 So. 2d 513, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 116, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 558, 2007 WL 924070

Snippet: ensure consistency between the rules and section 925.12, Florida Statutes (2006). See Amendments to Fla

In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-09-21

Citation: 938 So. 2d 978, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2208, 2006 WL 2690141

Snippet: ensure consistency between the rules and section 925.12, Florida Statutes (2006). We have jurisdiction