O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-2-22 (2019)

Criminal penalty for violations

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person, firm, partnership, corporation, society, or association who shall violate this article, relating to weights and measures in general, or any rule or regulation promulgated pursuant to this article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

History

Laws 1833, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 821.; Ga. L. 1851-52, p. 263, § 1; Code 1863, § 4458; Ga. L. 1865-66, p. 231, § 5; Code 1868, § 4502; Code 1873, § 4590; Code 1882, § 4590; Penal Code 1895, § 661;

Penal Code 1910, § 706; Code 1933, § 112-9901; Ga. L. 1941, p. 510, § 9; Ga. L. 1972, p. 654, § 2; Code 1981, § 10-2-21; Code 1981, § 10-2-22, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1993, p. 811, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Cited in Haynie v. State, 46 Ga. App. 310, 167 S.E. 612 (1933); Scott v. State, 53 Ga. App. 61, 185 S.E. 131 (1936).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 79 Am. Jur. 2d, Weights and Measures, § 40 et seq.

C.J.S. - 94 C.J.S., Weights and Measures, § 25 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Sentinel Offender Servs., LLC v. Glover, 766 S.E.2d 456 (Ga. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sentinel Offender Servs., LLC v. Glover, 766 S.E.2d 456 (Ga. 2014). · cites it 2× “, OCGA §§ 10-2-22; 40-1-55. Accordingly, we agree with the trial court that none of the provisions of the State-wide Probation Act are applicable to defendants sentenced in courts utilizing probation systems authorized by OCGA § 42-8-100 (g) (1).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.