Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 109A-2 - 209, enacted by Ga. L. 1962, p. 156, § 1.)
- Effect of mutual departure from contract terms, § 13-4-4.
- For article discussing exclusion or modification of warranties under the U.C.C., see 1 Ga. St. B.J. 191 (1964). For article, "Impracticability As Risk Allocation: The Effect of Changed Circumstances upon Contract Obligations for the Sale of Goods," see 22 Ga. L. Rev. 503 (1988). For note, "The Scope and Meaning of Waiver in Section 2-209 of the Uniform Commercial Code," see 5 Ga. L. Rev. 783 (1971).
- Effective use of bad faith to escape performance on original contract terms is barred, and extortion of "modification" without legitimate commercial reason is ineffective as a violation of duty of good faith. Fratelli Gardino v. Caribbean Lumber Co., 587 F.2d 204 (5th Cir. 1979).
- One having accepted benefits arising under contract after being notified of anticipated breach, and not having given notice of intention to rely on its exact terms, but having continued to accept benefits thereunder, may not recover for such alleged breach or failure to perform fully order the complete terms of the original agreement. Acceptance of such benefits after notice of an alleged breach will constitute waiver of breach. B-Lee's Sales Co. v. Shelton, 141 Ga. App. 870, 234 S.E.2d 702 (1977).
Cited in Lunsford v. Wilson, 113 Ga. App. 602, 149 S.E.2d 515 (1966); Ryder Truck Lines v. Scott, 129 Ga. App. 871, 201 S.E.2d 672 (1973); Pirrone v. Monarch Wine Co., 497 F.2d 25 (5th Cir. 1974); Cook-Davis Furn. Co. v. Duskin, 134 Ga. App. 264, 214 S.E.2d 565 (1975); Trust Co. v. Montgomery, 136 Ga. App. 742, 222 S.E.2d 196 (1975); Fratelli Gardino v. Caribbean Lumber Co., 447 F. Supp. 1337 (S.D. Ga. 1978); Dan Gurney Indus., Inc. v. Southeastern Wheels, Inc., 168 Ga. App. 504, 308 S.E.2d 637 (1983); Integrated Micro Sys. v. NEC Home Elec. (USA), Inc., 174 Ga. App. 197, 329 S.E.2d 554 (1985).
- 15A Am. Jur. 2d, Commercial Code, § 4. 67 Am. Jur. 2d, Sales, §§ 348-374.
6 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Commercial Code, § 2:60. 9A Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Estoppel and Waiver, § 39.
- 37 C.J.S., Frauds, Statute of, § 232. 77A C.J.S., Sales, § 109 et seq. 78 C.J.S., Sales, § 565.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 2-209.
- Promise of additional compensation for completing building or construction contract, 25 A.L.R. 1450; 55 A.L.R. 1333; 138 A.L.R. 136.
Necessity of independent consideration to support a modification of the price in a contract of sale, 34 A.L.R. 511.
Consideration for modification of terms of existing tenancy, 43 A.L.R. 1451; 93 A.L.R. 1404.
Duty to minimize damages by accepting offer modified by party who has breached contract of sale, 46 A.L.R. 1192.
Action involving rescission or right to rescind contract and to recover amount paid thereunder as one at law or in equity, 95 A.L.R. 1000.
Action based on rescission of contract as one arising on contract, express or implied, within the meaning of attachment statute, 95 A.L.R. 1028.
Pecuniary damage as essential to rescission of contract for purchase of real or personal property, 106 A.L.R. 125.
Repossession of chattels by seller upon their return or abandonment by buyer as effecting a mutual rescission or as evidence thereof, 106 A.L.R. 703.
Requirement of written contract as condition of mechanic's lien as affected by an oral modification, or a modification partly oral and partly written, of a written contract, or a subsequent modification in writing not registered or filed as required by statute, 108 A.L.R. 434.
Timeliness of tender or offer of return of consideration for release or compromise, required as a condition of setting it aside, 53 A.L.R.2d 757.
Validity and effect of provision in contract against mechanic's lien, 76 A.L.R.2d 1087; 75 A.L.R.3d 505.
Enforceability of voluntary promise of additional compensation because of unforeseen difficulties in performance of existing contract, 85 A.L.R.3d 259.
Affirmations or representations made after the sale is closed as basis of warranty under UCC § 2-313(1)(a), 47 A.L.R.4th 189.
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-02-06
Citation: 290 Ga. 486, 722 S.E.2d 701, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 365, 2012 WL 360514, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 140
Snippet: occurred here. See Hilton v. State, 233 Ga. 11 (2) (209 SE2d 606) (1974) (“Before a charge will constitute
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1979-05-02
Citation: 243 Ga. 627, 255 S.E.2d 718, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1014
Snippet: have harmed Amadeo. Hilton v. State, 233 Ga. 11 (2) (209 SE2d 606) (1974). The trial court explained this
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1975-01-07
Citation: 212 S.E.2d 322, 233 Ga. 495, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1357
Snippet: mislead the jury. See Hilton v. State, 233 Ga. 11 (2) (209 SE2d 606). IV. Inconsistent Verdicts. Defendant's