Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §11-9-103, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 362, § 1.)
- For article, "The Fourth Annual Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal Symposium, March 1, 2007: Consumer Bankruptcy Panel: Selected Hot BAPCPA Topics," see 23 Bank. Dev. J. 517 (2007). For article, "Eleventh Circuit Survey: January 1, 2008 - December 31, 2008: Article: Bankruptcy," see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 1141 (2009).
- In the light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Article 9 are included in the annotations for this Code section. For a table of comparable provisions, see the table at the beginning of the Article.
Enforceable title-retention agreement constitutes purchase money security interest within definition of that term. Food Serv. Equip. Co. v. First Nat'l Bank, 121 Ga. App. 421, 174 S.E.2d 216 (1970) (decided under former Code Section11-9-107).
- Security interest taken by the creditor, not to secure all or part of the purchase price of the collateral, but rather to secure the preexisting balance of the debtor's account with the creditor, did not fall within the definition of a purchase money security interest. In re Carter, 169 Bankr. 227 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1993) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-107).
- One who is a "lender," may acquire purchase money security interest in collateral to be purchased with proceeds of loan provided proceeds are in fact so used. Continental Oil Co. Agrico Chem. Co. Div. v. Sutton, 126 Ga. App. 78, 189 S.E.2d 925 (1972) (decided under former Code Section11-9-107).
- Where seller, rather than lender, claims purchase-money security interest, unexercised future advances clause is immaterial. Meadows v. Household Retail Servs., Inc. (In re Griffin), 9 Bankr. 880 (N.D. Ga. 1988) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-107).
- Where seller sold mobile home for cash sales price and bank financed loan for cash sales price, proceeds of which were then paid to seller, the bank, not seller, had purchase money security interest in the mobile home, and actual sale was not a retail installment transaction under O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31(a)(9). Massey v. Stephens, 155 Ga. App. 243, 270 S.E.2d 796 (1980) (decided under former Code Section11-9-107).
- Purchase money security interest must be in the item purchased, and if vendor of consumer goods is to be protected despite absence of filing, security interest cannot exceed price of item purchased in transaction out of which it arose. Roberts Furn. Co. v. Pierce, 507 F.2d 990 (5th Cir. 1975) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-107).
Transfer and assignment of a purchase money note and security agreement to a third party did not destroy the purchase money character of the security interest, where the assignment did not refinance, renew, or modify the debtor's purchase money debt. Brooks v. First Franklin Fin. Corp., 74 Bankr. 418 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1987) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-107).
- Refinancing or consolidating loans by paying off an old loan and extending a new one extinguishes the purchase money character of the original loan because the proceeds of the new loan are not used to acquire rights in the collateral. Franklin v. ITT Fin. Servs., 75 Bankr. 268 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1986) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-107).
Under Georgia law, the refinancing of a promissory note destroys the purchase money nature of the security interest. Hipps v. Landmark Fin. Servs., 89 Bankr. 264 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1988) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-107).
Where the debt secured contained both purchase money and nonpurchase money components, including the refinancing of prior obligations, the security interest of the creditor could not retain purchase money status, as it secured more than the "price" of the collateral. Lee v. Davis/McGraw, Inc., 169 Bankr. 790 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1994) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-107).
When debtor refinanced a prior purchase of furniture when the debtor financed a second purchase, the seller lost the seller's purchase money security interest status on the balance due from the first purchase because the installment contract failed to specify the order in which add-on costs, i.e., late fee, delivery fee, credit life insurance, and property insurance, abated upon payment. In re McClow, Bankr. (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Dec. 17, 2009).
- Simultaneous purchase on credit of a vehicle and an extended service contract, and payment of a documentary fee and a certificate of title fee, did not transform the secured creditor's claim into a non-purchase money security interest, disqualifying its claim for treatment under the hanging paragraph at the end of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a), because the cost of the additional items was part of the price of the vehicle. In re Murray, 352 Bankr. 340 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006).
- Because the definition of "cash sales price" under O.C.G.A. § 11-9-103(a)(2) included any amount paid to the buyer or to a third party to satisfy a lease on or a lien on or a security interest in a motor vehicle used as a trade-in, that entire amount was included in the purchase money security interest under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a). In re Graupner, 356 Bankr. 907 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006), aff'd, NO. 4:07-CV-37 (CDL), 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46144 (M.D. Ga. 2007).
Monies paid on debtor's behalf for an extended service contract and gap insurance were part of the purchase price of the debtor's vehicle for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 11-9-103 and the unnumbered, hanging paragraph following 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(9). The service contract was a charge for "servicing" the motor vehicle under O.C.G.A § 10-1-31(a)(1), and applying the close nexus standard in § 11-9-103 led the court to believe that gap insurance was also included in the purchase money security interest. In re Spratling, 377 Bankr. 941 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2007).
Because a debtor purchased a vehicle for personal use within 910 days of filing a bankruptcy petition under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a), the cramdown provision of 11 U.S.C. § 506 did not apply; instead, O.C.G.A. § 11-9-103 determined that the purchase money security interest included the negative equity of a trade-in that was integral to the sales transaction. Graupner v. Nuvell Credit Corp., F. Supp. 2d (M.D. Ga. June 26, 2007), aff'd, 537 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2008).
Under O.C.G.A. §§ 10-1-31(a) and11-9-103, negative equity in a debtor's trade-in vehicle was properly regarded as a purchase money security interest under the hanging paragraph referencing 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5) in that there was a close nexus to the purchase of a vehicle for personal use within 910 days of filing for Chapter 13 relief. Thus, 11 U.S.C. § 506 did not apply to cram down the creditor's secured claim. Graupner v. Nuvell Credit Corp. (In re Graupner), 537 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2008).
- Lender obtained a purchase-money security interest in cows sold by a third party to the debtor although the debtor took care of the cows for the purpose of inspecting and milking several weeks before the loan was closed and legal ownership passed, and although the money was disbursed almost two weeks after the loan was closed, since the loan and its disbursement were closely allied to the sale. United States v. Hooks, 40 Bankr. 715 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1984) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-107).
- 68A Am. Jur. 2d, Secured Transactions, §§ 75-84, 841.
- 82 C.J.S., Statutes, § 309.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 9-103.
- Personal liability for mortgage debt of real owner who procures mortgage to be executed by another, 25 A.L.R. 1486.
Priority as between mechanic's lien and purchase-money mortgage, 73 A.L.R.2d 1407.
Consignment transactions under Uniform Commercial Code Article 9 on secured transactions, 58 A.L.R.6th 289.
Determination of appropriate Chapter 11 "cramdown" rate of interest, 17 A.L.R. Fed. 3d 8.
No results found for Georgia Code 11-9-103.