O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31 (2019)

Definitions; construction

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) As used in this article, the term: (1) “Cash sale price” means the price stated in a retail installment contract for which the seller would have sold to the buyer and the buyer would have bought from the seller the motor vehicle which is the subject matter of the retail installment contract if such sale had been a sale for cash instead of a retail installment transaction. The cash sale price may include any taxes; registration, certificate of title, license, and other fees; and charges for accessories and their installation and for delivery, servicing, repairing, or improving the motor vehicle. The cash sale price may also include any amount paid to the buyer or to a third party on behalf of the buyer to satisfy a lease on or a lien on or a security interest in a motor vehicle used as a trade-in on the motor vehicle which is the subject of a retail installment transaction under this article. (2) “Finance charge” means the amount agreed upon between the buyer and the seller, as limited in this article, to be added to the cash sale price, the amount, if any, included for insurance and other benefits, if a separate charge is made therefor, and official fees, in determining the time sale price. (3) “Holder” of a retail installment contract means the retail seller

SELLING/OTHER TRADE PRACTICES

of the motor vehicle under the contract or, if the contract is purchased by a sales finance company or another assignee, the sales finance company or other assignee at the time of the determination. (4) “Motor vehicle” means any device or vehicle including automobiles, motorcycles, motor trucks, trailers, and all other vehicles operated over the public highways and streets of this state and propelled by power other than muscular power but does not include traction engines, road rollers, implements of husbandry and other agricultural equipment, and such vehicles as run only upon a track. (5) “Official fees” means the fees prescribed by law for filing, recording, or otherwise perfecting and releasing or satisfying a retained title or a lien created by a retail installment contract. (6) “Person” means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or any other group however organized. (7) “Purchase price” means the time balance shown in the contract plus the down payment. (8) “Retail buyer” or “buyer” means a person who buys a motor vehicle from a retail seller not principally for the purpose of resale and who executes a retail installment contract in connection therewith or a person who succeeds to the rights and obligations of such person. (9) “Retail installment contract” or “contract” means an instrument or instruments creating a purchase money security interest. (10) “Retail installment seller” or “seller” means a person engaged in the business of selling motor vehicles to retail buyers in retail installment transactions. (11) “Retail installment transaction” means any transaction evidenced by a retail installment contract. (12) “Sales finance company” means a person engaged in the business of purchasing retail installment contracts from one or more retail sellers. The term includes but is not limited to a bank, trust company, or installment loan company, if so engaged. The term does not include the pledge of an aggregate number of such contracts to secure a bona fide loan thereon. (13) “Time sale price” means the cash sale price of a motor vehicle, the amount included for insurance and other benefits if a separate charge is made therefor, official fees, and finance charges. The time sale price may also include, if it has not been included in the cash sale price, any amount paid to the buyer or to a third party on behalf of the buyer to satisfy a lease on or a lien on or a security interest in a motor

vehicle used as a trade-in on the motor vehicle which is the subject of a retail installment transaction under this article. (b) The rules of statutory construction contained in Chapter 3 of Title 1 shall apply to this article.

History

Ga. L. 1967, p. 674, § 2; Ga. L. 1999, p. 1229, § 1; Ga. L. 2020, p. 156, § 8/SB 462.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2020, p. 156, § 10/SB 462, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “This Act shall apply to all installment loan agreements entered into on and after July 1, 2020.”

Law reviews. For article, “Eleventh Circuit Survey: January 1, 2008 - December 31, 2008: Article: Bankruptcy,” see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 1141 (2009). For article, “The Over-Encumbered Trade-In in Chapter 13,” see 29 Emory Bankr. Dev. J. 15 (2012).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS ANALYSIS RETAIL INSTALLMENT TRANSACTION MOTOR VEHICLE Retail Installment Transaction Not “retail installment transaction” when bank, not seller, obtains lien. - When seller sold mobile home for a “cash sales price” and bank financed loan for the “cash sales price,” the proceeds of which were then paid to the seller, the bank, not the seller, had a purchase money security interest in the mobile home, and the actual sale was not a “retail installment transaction” under paragraphs (a)(9) and (a)(11) of this section. Massey v. Stephens, 155 Ga. App. 243, 270 S.E.2d 796, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2695 (1980). Motor Vehicle Caterpillar 977L Traxcavator does not fall under the definition of “motor vehicle” found either in paragraph (a)(4) of O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31 or the general definition of “motor vehicle” under O.C.G.A. § 40-1-1(33) but does fit the definition of “special mobile equipment” under § 40-1-1(59). Battle v. Yancey Bros. Co., 157 Ga. App. 277, 277 S.E.2d 280, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 1779 (1981). Purchase money interest in negative equity financed as part of trade-in. - Because the definition of “cash sales price” included any amount paid to the buyer or to a third party to

satisfy a lease on or a lien on or a security interest in a motor vehicle used as a trade-in, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31, that entire amount was included in the purchase money security interest under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a). In re Graupner, 356 B.R. 907, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3515 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006), aff’d, No. 4:07-CV-37, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46144 (M.D. Ga. June 26, 2007). Monies paid on debtor’s behalf for an extended service contract and gap insurance were part of the purchase price of the debtor’s vehicle for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 11-9-103 and the unnumbered, hanging paragraph following U.S.C. § 1325(a)(9). The service contract was a charge for “servicing” the motor vehicle under O.C.G.A § 10-1-31(a)(1), and applying the close nexus standard in § 11-9-103 led the court to believe that gap insurance was also included in the purchase money security interest. In re Spratling, 377 B.R. 941, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 3556 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2007). Under O.C.G.A. §§ 10-1-31(a) and 11-9-103, negative equity in a debtor’s trade-in vehicle was properly regarded as a purchase money security interest under the hanging paragraph referencing 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5) in that there was a close nexus to the purchase of a vehicle for

SELLING/OTHER TRADE PRACTICES

personal use within 910 days of filing for Chapter 13 relief. Thus, 11 U.S.C. § 506 did not apply to cram down the creditor’s secured claim. Graupner v. Nuvell Credit Corp., 537 F.3d 1295, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16582 (11th Cir. 2008). Notice objection did not apply. - With respect to the creditor’s deficiency claim arising from a sale of a truck in which the creditor had perfected a first-priority lien, the debtor’s objection based on O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31, which

requires additional notice to recover a deficiency against a buyer, did not apply to bar the claim because the creditor was not a sales finance company under the Georgia statute given that it had not purchased a retail installment contract from a seller and was not engaged in the business of purchasing retail installment contracts. Ambrose v. Advantage Funding Commer. Capital Corp. (In re Ambrose), 568 B.R. 716, 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 665 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2017).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1987–2016 · leading case: In Re Graupner, 356 B.R. 907 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006).
In Re Graupner, 356 B.R. 907 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006). · cites it 11× “Debtor’s argument that O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31 and the other provisions of the MVSFA do not determine purchase money security interest status, is, however, well taken.”
Harris v. State, 686 S.E.2d 777 (Ga. 2009). · cites it 4× “, OCGA §§ 10-1-31 (a) (4) (as used in article on sales financing, “ ‘[m]otor vehicle’ means any device or vehicle including automobiles, motorcycles, motor trucks, trailers, and all other vehicles operated over the public highways and streets of this state and propelled by power…”
Crider v. Zurich Ins., 474 S.E.2d 89 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “, OCGA § 10-1-2 (5) (Retail Installment & Home Solicitation Sales Act); OCGA § 10-1-31 (4) (Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act); OCGA § 10-1-622 (10) (Georgia Motor Vehicle Franchise Practices Act); OCGA § 12-9-43 (17) (Georgia Motor Vehicle Emission Inspection & Maintenance Act);…”
In Re Graupner, 537 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2008). “" See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31(a)(1). Reading these sections in pari materia — which the bankruptcy court determined was proper in light of the ambiguity in section 11-9-103(a)(2) and the relationship between the two statutes — the court held that "the Georgia General Assembly…”
Sun v. Mercedes Benz Credit Corp., 562 S.E.2d 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “21 See OCGA § 10-1-31 (a) (2) (defining “Finance Charge” as “amount agreed upon between the buyer and the seller .”
Suntrust Bank v. Venable, 791 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. 2016). · cites it 2× “3 We specifically reject SunTrust’s invitation to hold that OCGA § 10-1-31 (a) (9)’s definition of a “retail installment contract” as that term is used in the Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act (“MVSFA”), OCGA § 10-1-30 et seq.”
S. Guar. Corp. v. Doyle, 353 S.E.2d 510 (Ga. 1987). · cites it 2× “The GMVSFA has been applied to mobile homes because of the judicial construction given to the definition of “motor vehicle” appearing at OCGA § 10-1-31 (a) (4). E.g., Holder v. Brock, 129 Ga.”
Ervin v. Arnold, 399 S.E.2d 548 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “Although evidence established that the tractor and trailer, being “vehicles operated over the public highways and streets of this state and propelled by power other than muscular power,” see OCGA § 10-1-31 (a) (4), are “motor vehicles” within the meaning of the Motor Vehicle…”
State of Washington v. Joshua Michael Barnes, 382 P.3d 729 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “1 (emphasis omitted) (quoting Ga. Code Ann. § 10-1-31 (a)(4)). Nevertheless, the court held the riding lawn mower not to be a motor vehicle.”
Tollett v. Green Tree Acceptance, Inc., 379 S.E.2d 2 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 10-1-31 (3) defines a “holder” of a retail installment contract as “the retail seller of the motor vehicle under the contract or, if the contract is purchased by a sales finance company or another assignee, the sales finance company or other assignee at the time of the…”
— 10-1-31(4) — 1 case
Crider v. Zurich Ins., 474 S.E.2d 89 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). “, OCGA § 10-1-2 (5) (Retail Installment & Home Solicitation Sales Act); OCGA § 10-1-31 (4) (Motor Vehicle Sales Finance Act); OCGA § 10-1-622 (10) (Georgia Motor Vehicle Franchise Practices Act); OCGA § 12-9-43 (17) (Georgia Motor Vehicle Emission Inspection & Maintenance Act);…”
— 10-1-31(a)(1) — 2 cases
In Re Graupner, 356 B.R. 907 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006). “Debtor’s argument that O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31 and the other provisions of the MVSFA do not determine purchase money security interest status, is, however, well taken.”
In Re Graupner, 537 F.3d 1295 (11th Cir. 2008). “" See O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31(a)(1). Reading these sections in pari materia — which the bankruptcy court determined was proper in light of the ambiguity in section 11-9-103(a)(2) and the relationship between the two statutes — the court held that "the Georgia General Assembly…”
— 10-1-31(a)(4) — 1 case
Harris v. State, 686 S.E.2d 777 (Ga. 2009). “, OCGA §§ 10-1-31 (a) (4) (as used in article on sales financing, “ ‘[m]otor vehicle’ means any device or vehicle including automobiles, motorcycles, motor trucks, trailers, and all other vehicles operated over the public highways and streets of this state and propelled by power…”
— 10-1-31(a)(9) — 1 case
In Re Graupner, 356 B.R. 907 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006). “Debtor’s argument that O.C.G.A. § 10-1-31 and the other provisions of the MVSFA do not determine purchase money security interest status, is, however, well taken.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.