Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §11-9-612, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 362, § 1.)
§ 11-1-201 not of itself sufficient for making determination. - Question of whether reasonable notification of time after which private sale or other intended disposition is to be made has been sent by secured party to debtor cannot be determined solely on definitional basis of O.C.G.A. § 11-1-201. Geohagan v. Commercial Credit Corp., 130 Ga. App. 828, 204 S.E.2d 784 (1974) (decided under former Code Section11-9-504).
- Notice sent to debtor, at address given when debtor executed security agreement, by certified mail, return receipt requested, and received by debtor two days after mailing notifying debtor of creditor's intention to sell collateral at private sale ten days after postmark was effective, was a satisfactory and reasonable method of notification. Motor Contract Co. v. Sawyer, 123 Ga. App. 207, 180 S.E.2d 282 (1971) (decided under former Code Section11-9-504).
- Where there is conflicting evidence as to nature and extent of debtor's knowledge, debtor should not be estopped from raising lack of notice as a defense. Rather, question of "reasonable notification " should be submitted to jury. Comfort Trane Air Conditioning Co. v. Trane Co., 592 F.2d 1373 (5th Cir. 1979).
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 9-612.
No results found for Georgia Code 11-9-612.