Investigations by director; actions to enforce article
✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
The director shall have the authority to investigate any apparent violation of this part and to take any action authorized under this part as he deems necessary and may institute proceedings of mandamus or other proper legal proceedings to enforce this part.
History
Code 1981, § 12-8-29, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 412, § 1.
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. - 73 C.J.S., Public Administrative Law and Procedure, § 190.
Richard E. Dunn v. City of Stonecrest, 890 S.E.2d 781 (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2דOn the contrary, OCGA § 12-8-29 grants the director discretionary authority to “investigate any apparent violation of this part and to take any action authorized under this part as he deems necessary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.