O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-3-707 (2019)

Record date

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The bylaws may fix or provide the manner of fixing the record date to determine the members entitled to notice of a members’ meeting, to demand a special meeting to vote, or to take any other action. If the bylaws do not fix or provide for fixing such a record date, the board may fix a future date as such a record date.

(b) A record date fixed under this Code section may not be more than 70 days before the meeting or action requiring a determination of members.

(c) A determination of members entitled to notice of or to vote at a membership meeting is effective for any adjournment of the meeting unless the board fixes a new record date, which it must do if the meeting is adjourned to a date more than 120 days after the date fixed for the original meeting.

(d) If a court orders a meeting adjourned to a date more than 120 days after the date fixed for the original meeting, it may provide that the original record date continues in effect or it may fix a new record date.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-3-707, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 465, § 1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Carla Willis v. Water's Edge Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).
Carla Willis v. Water's Edge Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 6× “” OCGA § 14-3-707 (a). In such instances, the Georgia Nonprofit Corporation Code requires that “the number of votes cast by ballot equals or exceeds the quorum required to be present at a meeting authorizing the action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.