Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §14-8-44, enacted by Ga. L. 1994, p. 1674, § 2; Ga. L. 1995, p. 470, § 8.)
- Former Code Sections 14-8-44 through 14-8-92 were based on Laws 1840, Cobbs 1851 Digest, p. 589, 590; org. Code 1863, §§ 1900-1904, 1907-1921, 3495; Code 1868, §§ 1888-1892, 1895-1908, 1921, 3518; Code 1873, §§ 1884-1886, 1901-1918, 3576; Code 1882, §§ 1894-1899, 1901-1919, 3576; Code 1895, §§ 2637-2641, 2644-2660, 5346; Civil Code 1910, §§ 3162-3170, 3173-3190, 5941; Code 1933, §§ 75-107, 75-109, 75-203 - 75-210, 75-301 - 75-315, 110-309; and Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 14 and were repealed by Ga. L. 1984, p. 1439, § 1, effective April 1, 1985.
- For note on the 1994 amendment of Code Sections 14-8-44 to 14-8-61, see 11 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 77 (1994).
Total Results: 1
Court: Ga. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-07-12T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 537 S.E.2d 203, 245 Ga. App. 55, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 3154
Snippet: the arbitration proceedings was included in the appellate record. Dicus did not file a civil action for damages. [10] Shaw v. Ruiz, 207 Ga.App. 299, 305(13), 428 S.E.2d 98 (1993). [11] See OCGA §§ 18-2-21; 18-2-22; see also OCGA §§ 44-14-6; 44-14-8; 44-14-12. [12] Kesler v. Veal, 257 Ga. 677, 678, 362 S.E.2d 214 (1987). [13] Gilbert, supra, 232 Ga.App. at 93(2), 499 S.E.2d 731. [14] Dicus disputed this allegation and offered the affidavit of a member of the arbitration firm who testified that