O.C.G.A.
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Code Sections 14-8-44 through 14-8-60 and this Code section shall become effective on July 1, 1994, and shall govern all foreign limited liability partnerships transacting business in this state on or after July 1, 1994.
History
(Code 1981, § 14-8-61, enacted by Ga. L. 1994, p. 1674, § 2; Ga. L. 1995, p. 10, § 14.)
Annotations
Editor’s notes. - Prior to the 1995 amendment declaring an effective date of July 1, 1994, this Code section stated that Code Sections 14-8-44 through 14-8-60 and this Code section became effective April 1, 1994. Section 3 of Ga. L. 1994, p. 1674, was amended in committee to pro-
vide that the Act as a whole would have an effective date of July 1, 1994. Further, the Governor did not sign the Act until April 19, 1994. For repeal of former Code Section 14-8-61 in 1984, see the Editor’s notes following Code Section 14-8-44.
Notes of Decisions
Doctors Hosp. of Augusta, Inc. v. Bonner, 392 S.E.2d 897 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990).
· cites it 2× “1439, prior to which general scope of partners’ authority would cover principle involved, former OCGA § 14-8-61). An admission by an employee of the partnership within the scope of his authority can be considered against the partnership.”
Arrington v. Columbia Nitrogen Corp., 309 S.E.2d 428 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 8× “Defendant contends that to affirm the trial court’s decision, the Court of Appeals must reconcile the language of OCGA § 14-8-61 (formerly Code § 75-302) with the 19th Century Supreme Court of Georgia decision of Campbell & Jones v.”
Cohen v. Publishers Paper Co., 318 S.E.2d 796 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 2× “]” See also OCGA § 14-8-61. The trial court did not err in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.