Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §14-9-602, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 931, § 12.)
- For note on 1989 amendment to this Code section, see 6 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 184 (1989).
Note to Georgia Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act This section provides for how and when a general partner ceases to be such, and for the liability of a general partner who ceases to be such to creditors and to the partnership.
Prior Georgia Law Sections 14-8-29 and 14-8-31 provide for dissolution of a general partnership upon partner dissociation, but the general partnership statute does not define when a partner ceases to be such and does not provide for withdrawal without dissolution of the partnership.
Comparison With Official RULPA Section 14-9-602 incorporates, in Subsection (a), RULPA Section 402, so that withdrawal of a general partner is dealt with in one section. Subsection (a) differs from RULPA Section 402 by clarifying that (1) partner consent prevents withdrawal only as to those events, like bankruptcy or dissolution of a business-entity partner, where there may be some question whether the partner can continue as such despite occurrence of the event; (2) a corporate partner does not withdraw on revocation of its charter until it has been given an opportunity to have the charter reinstated; (3) a trust itself can be a partner; (4) withdrawal may be triggered by other events specified in the partnership agreement; and (5) the partnership agreement may provide for notice of withdrawal in situations other than voluntary withdrawal.
Subsections (b) and (c) differ from the official version of Section 14-9-602 by clarifying what constitutes withdrawal in violation of the agreement, that the partnership can recover the cost of replacing a general partner's services, that 90 days' notice is required for withdrawal and that the partnership agreement may specify damages for wrongful withdrawal. Wrongful withdrawal may include withdrawal that results from removal by the partners, judicial dissolution, or other means stemming from misconduct of the general partner other than voluntary and premature withdrawal.
Subsections (d) and (e) have been added to the official version to clarify the withdrawn general partner's liability to third parties. Under subsection (d), one who has ceased to be a partner is nevertheless liable to creditors who thereafter extend credit before an appropriate filing is made to reflect the withdrawal. [Note that after the certificate is amended to remove a partner's name, the person is no longer a "general partner" under Section 14-9-101(5) even if the partner has not otherwise ceased to be such under Section 14-9-602.]
Under subsection (e), even after the appropriate filing under subsection (d) is made, one who has ceased to be a general partner may continue to be liable to those who extend credit after the withdrawal and who have a reasonable basis for believing that the partner continued as such. Thus, creditors who have relied on the general partner's former status are protected. The situations in which the third party can recover from the former partner - that is, in which the third party is deemed to have a reasonable basis for believing that the former partner remained such - are set forth in subsection (e)(1) and (2). In general, the third party must either know or have notice of the withdrawal. Such notice must, under subsection (f), be more than the mere constructive notice that consists in amendment of the certificate to reflect the partner's withdrawal (although this amendment can serve as the basis of the creditor's knowledge of withdrawal). The notice provision is based on Section 14-8-35, which applies to partner powers and liabilities after dissolution of a general partnership. Since Section 14-9-602 specifically applies to partner withdrawal it, and not Section 14-8-35, will govern whether or not withdrawal causes dissolution under Section 14-9-801.
Note that subsections (d) and (e) cut off liability only to certain persons who extend credit after the general partner's withdrawal. Thus, subsection (d) clearly states that a person who ceases to be a partner shall be personally liable to prior creditors, and subsection (e) applies only to post-notice creditors. There is nothing in the partnership statutes that would permit a partner to cut off an accrued liability by ceasing to be a partner. In fact, Section 14-8-36, which applies to limited partnerships by virtue of Section 14-9-1204, provides that such accrued liability is not cut off even by dissolution of the partnership.
Cross-References "Knowledge" and "notice" defined: § 14-8-3. "General partner" defined: § Section14-9-101(5). General partner withdrawal as cause of dissolution: § 14-9-801(3).
- 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partnership, § 815 et seq.
No results found for Georgia Code 14-9-602.