Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 14-9-802 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 14 CORPORATIONS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND ASSOCIATIONS

Section 9. Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 14-9-100 through 14-9-1204.

ARTICLE 8 DISSOLUTION

14-9-802. Judicial dissolution.

On application by or for a partner, the court may decree dissolution of a limited partnership whenever:

  1. It is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the partnership agreement; or
  2. A general partner has been guilty of such misconduct as tends to affect prejudicially the carrying on of the business.

(Code 1981, §14-9-802, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 1.)

Law reviews.

- For article, "Business Associations," see 63 Mercer L. Rev. 83 (2011).

COMMENT

Note to Georgia Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act This section states the grounds for dissolution of a limited partnership by judicial decree. It applies to the exclusion of Section 14-8-32 pursuant to Section 14-9-1204.

Prior Georgia Law Section 14-9A-42(a)(3) provides that a limited partner has the same right to seek judicial dissolution as a general partner, thus implicitly referring to Section 14-8-32.

Comparison With Official RULPA The official version has been expanded by the addition of subsection (b), which is based on Section 14-8-32(3). This mitigates the effect of Section 14-9-603 which, by deleting the limited partners' right of withdrawal except as otherwise provided for in the agreement, can have the effect of rendering the limiteds vulnerable to general partner misconduct.

Cross-References General partner ceases to be such by court-adjudicated incompetence: § 14-9-602(a)(6)(B). Causes of dissolution of limited partnership: § 14-9-801.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Question of fact precluded summary judgment in dissolution of partnership.

- With regard to the application of a father/grandfather to dissolve a family farm partnership, the trial court erred by resolving the issue on summary judgment because the evidence presented an issue of fact for the jury as to whether the father/grandfather had assigned away all the partnership interests in the family farm business. Godwin v. Mizpah Farms, LLLP, 330 Ga. App. 31, 766 S.E.2d 497 (2014).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partnership, §§ 896, 897.

C.J.S.

- 68 C.J.S., Partnership, § 613.

API Error: Request was throttled. Expected available in 21 seconds.

No results found for Georgia Code 14-9-802.