
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §15-1-21, enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 806, § 1/HB 808; Ga. L. 2017, p. 157, § 2-2/HB 126.)
- This Code section became effective January 1, 2017.
The 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, in subsection (a), substituted "Pursuant to Article VI, Section VII, Paragraph VI" for "Pursuant to Paragraph VI of Section VII of Article VI" in the first sentence, and added the second sentence; substituted "The commission shall consist of ten members" for "The Judicial Qualifications Commission shall consist of seven members" in subsection (b); and rewrote subsections (d) through (o).
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2016, Code Section 15-1-19, as enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 806, § 1/HB 808, was redesignated as Code Section 15-1-21.
- Ga. L. 2016, p. 806, § 2/HB 808, provided, in part, that this Code section "shall become effective on January 1, 2017, only if an amendment to the Constitution abolishing the existing Judicial Qualifications Commission and requiring the General Assembly to create and provide by general law for the composition and manner of appointment of a new Judicial Qualifications Commission, with such commission having the power to discipline, remove, and cause involuntary retirement of judges, and providing for exceptions to certain disclosures is ratified by the voters at the November, 2016, state-wide general election. If such an amendment is not so ratified, then this Act shall not become effective and shall stand repealed on January 1, 2017." That amendment was ratified by the voters in the November 2016 General Election.
Ga. L. 2017, p. 157, § 1-1/HB 126, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "Part I of this Act shall be known and may be cited as 'The Judicial Qualifications Commission Improvement Act of 2017.'"
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-05-16
Citation: 888 S.E.2d 109, 316 Ga. 490
Snippet: be chosen from a county master jury list”) and 15-12-1 (5) (defining the term “‘[c]ounty master jury
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-06-01
Citation: 874 S.E.2d 52, 313 Ga. 811
Snippet: excuse constitutes ‘good cause’” under OCGA § 15-12-1 (a)); Crider v. Sneider, 243 Ga. 642, 645-646 (1)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-05-17
Citation: 858 S.E.2d 703, 311 Ga. 524
Snippet: cause” inquiry under former version of OCGA § 15-12-1.1 (a) (1)); Joyner v. State, 251 Ga. 84, 85 (303
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-12-07
Citation: 852 S.E.2d 509, 310 Ga. 520
Snippet: juror where the juror shows “good cause.” OCGA § 15-12- 1.1 (a) (1); see also Young v. State, 290 Ga. 392
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2020-10-19
Citation: 850 S.E.2d 110, 310 Ga. 180
Snippet: the Jury Composition Reform Act of 2011, OCGA § 15-12-1 et seq. We held that the list from which Fulton
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-10-21
Citation: 307 Ga. 351
Snippet: jurors be selected randomly. See also OCGA § 15-12-1 (2) (defining “choose” and “chosen” for purposes
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-09-09
Citation: 306 Ga. 764
Snippet: service would impose an undue hardship. OCGA § 15-12-1 (a).” Stewart v. State, 277 Ga. 768, 769- 770
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-05-15
Citation: 301 Ga. 171, 800 S.E.2d 307, 2017 WL 2061675, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 383
Snippet: L. 2011, p. 59, §§ 1-5, 1-16 (amending OCGA §§ 15-12-1 and 15-12-40.1). The Clerks Council is required
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-01-21
Citation: 294 Ga. 379, 754 S.E.2d 29, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 145, 2014 WL 211229, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 64
Snippet: 79 (106 SCt 1712, 90 LE2d 69) (1986). OCGA§ 15-12-1.1 (a) (2). The trial judge found the State’s
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-01-21
Snippet: must make a prima 3 OCGA § 15-12-1.1 (a) (2).
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-09-23
Citation: 293 Ga. 641, 748 S.E.2d 896, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2954, 2013 WL 5303230, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 716
Snippet: OCGA § 15-12-1.1, effective July 1, 2011, which redesignated former OCGA § 15-12-1 as OCGA § 15-12-1.1 and
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-02-06
Citation: 290 Ga. 512, 722 S.E.2d 725, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 352, 2012 WL 360524, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 143
Snippet: jurors indiscriminately in violation of OCGA § 15-12-1.1 and of this Court’s holding in Yates v. State
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-01-23
Citation: 290 Ga. 392, 721 S.E.2d 855, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 205, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 79
Snippet: excused or an affidavit as required by OCGA § 15-12-1.1. He further argues that the jurors were excused
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-03-18
Citation: 708 S.E.2d 362, 288 Ga. 876, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 794, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 251
Snippet: that the trial court failed to comply with OCGA § 15-12-1 (a) (1), (3). That statute provides that “any person
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-15
Citation: 694 S.E.2d 316, 287 Ga. 63, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 732, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 227
Snippet: from jury duty pursuant to OCGA § 15-12-1.0 [sic].”3 OCGA § 15-12-1 (a) (1) provides in relevant part
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-01
Citation: 691 S.E.2d 854, 286 Ga. 839, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 551, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 186
Snippet: 31. Stinski's claim that application of OCGA §§ 15-12-1 and 15-12-60 in his case resulted in the unconstitutional
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-02-11
Citation: 657 S.E.2d 213, 283 Ga. 102, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 435, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 150
Snippet: deferred until the following term. See OCGA § 15-12-1 (a) (1) (authorizing deferral of jury service to
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-10-09
Citation: 653 S.E.2d 439, 282 Ga. 774, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3070, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 729
Snippet: appear in pages of the record he cites. See OCGA § 15-12-1(a)(1); McClain v. State, 267 Ga. 378(1)(c), 477
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-04-24
Citation: 644 S.E.2d 116, 281 Ga. 875
Snippet: one thing for long periods of time. See OCGA § 15-12-1(a); Sealey v. State, 277 Ga. 617(8), 593 S.E.2d
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-11-07
Citation: 621 S.E.2d 742, 280 Ga. 100, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3358, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 770
Snippet: an available courtroom was limited. See OCGA § 15-12-1(a); McClain v. State, 267 Ga. 378, 381-382(1)(c)