Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §15-11-264, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242.)
- Discovery, T. 17, C. 16.
- For article, "The Prosecuting Attorney in Georgia's Juvenile Courts," see 13 Ga. St. B. J. 27 (2008).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under pre-2014 Code Section 15-11-75, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section. See the Editor's notes at the beginning of the chapter.
- In a juvenile proceeding wherein the juvenile was adjudicated delinquent as a result of a battery against a schoolmate on a school bus, the trial court did not err in allegedly failing to enforce the discovery provisions of former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-75(a)(7) (see now O.C.G.A. § 15-11-541) and in allegedly failing to remedy a Brady violation because the videotape at issue was not in the custody and control of the State of Georgia; the juvenile could have obtained the evidence had the juvenile simply subpoenaed the video prior to trial and, significantly, the unrebutted evidence of record established that the videotape lacked any exculpatory or evidentiary value since the videotape was blank. In the Interest of E.J., 283 Ga. App. 648, 642 S.E.2d 179 (2007) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 15-11-75).
- Neither the U.S. Const., amend. 14 nor the state Constitution mandates pretrial discovery in proceedings to terminate parental rights. Ray v. Department of Human Resources, 155 Ga. App. 81, 270 S.E.2d 303 (1980) (decided under former law).
- Because termination of parental rights is more civil in nature than criminal, it generally is the legislative intent to grant discovery of evidence relevant to an issue in controversy, except when otherwise barred. Ray v. Department of Human Resources, 155 Ga. App. 81, 270 S.E.2d 303 (1980) (decided under former law).
No results found for Georgia Code 15-11-264.