O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-11-480 (2019)

When jeopardy attaches

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) When a child enters a denial to a petition alleging his or her delinquency, jeopardy attaches when the first witness is sworn at the adjudication hearing.

(b) When a child enters an admission to a petition alleging his or her delinquency, jeopardy attaches when the court accepts the admission.

History

Code 1981, § 15-11-480, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in In the Interest of M.D.H., 300 Ga. 46, 793 S.E.2d 49 (2016).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2016–2018 · leading case: In the Interest of M. D. H., 793 S.E.2d 49 (Ga. 2016).
In the Interest of M. D. H., 793 S.E.2d 49 (Ga. 2016). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 15-11-480 (explaining that jeopardy attaches in a juvenile delinquency proceeding when the first witness is sworn or the child enters an admission and the court accepts it).”
In the Interest of J. H., a Child, 783 S.E.2d 367 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “*851 OCGA § 15-11-480 (b) specifically provides that jeopardy attaches when the juvenile court accepts a child’s admission to a petition alleging delinquency, and the State concedes that jeopardy had attached in this case before the juvenile court granted the oral motion to…”
In the Interest of C. W., a Child, 815 S.E.2d 123 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “3 OCGA § 15-11-480 (a) provides that jeopardy attaches in a juvenile proceeding when the first witness is sworn at the adjudicatory hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.