O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-12-7 (2019)

Compensation of court bailiffs and expense allowance for trial or grand jurors

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The first grand jury impaneled at the fall term of the superior courts of the several counties shall fix:

(1) The compensation of court bailiffs in the superior courts of such counties for the next succeeding year, such compensation not to be less than $5.00 per diem. The same compensation shall be allowed to bailiffs of the several state courts and special courts as is allowed bailiffs in the superior court of the county in which the state or special court is located;

(2) An expense allowance for trial or grand jurors in the superior courts of such counties for the next succeeding year not to be less than $5.00 nor to exceed $50.00 per diem. The same expense allowance shall be allowed to jurors of the several state courts and special courts as is allowed jurors in the superior court of the county in which the state or special court is located; and

(3) An expense allowance for grand jurors, such expense allowance not to be less than $5.00 nor to exceed $50.00 per diem.

(b) Any increase in the compensation of court bailiffs or increases in expense allowances for jurors fixed by a grand jury shall be subject to the approval of the governing authority of the county.

History

(Orig. Code 1863, § 3846; Code 1868, § 3866; Ga. L. 1871-72, p. 47, § 4; Code 1873, § 3940; Ga. L. 1878-79, p. 190, § 1; Code 1882, § 3940; Ga. L. 1890-91, p. 80, § 1; Ga. L. 1895, p. 74, § 1; Penal Code 1895, § 872; Penal Code 1910, § 876; Ga. L. 1919, p. 104, § 1; Code 1933, § 59-120; Ga. L. 1946, p. 72, § 1; Ga. L. 1957, p. 43, § 1; Ga. L. 1966, p. 442, § 1; Ga. L. 1971, p. 205, § 1; Ga. L. 1972, p. 1132, § 1; Ga. L. 1974, p. 325, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 684, § 1; Ga. L. 1979, p. 601, § 1; Ga. L. 1981, p. 685, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 616, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 242, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 790, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 836, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1587, § 1; Ga. L. 2008, p. 168, § 1/HB 1086; Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-8/HB 415; Ga. L. 2014, p. 862, § 5/HB 1078.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Compensation of grand jurors and trial jurors, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. XI. Discrimination against employee for attending a ju-

dicial proceeding in response to a court order or process, § 34-1-3. Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-1/HB 415, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: ‘‘This Act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Jury Composition Reform Act of 2011.’ ’’

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Intent of section. - This section reveals an intent to effectuate three purposes: (1) to fix by law a maximum for compensation of bailiffs; (2) to vest in the county authorities of each county the right to determine the amount of compensation in that county, not to exceed such maximum; and (3) to authorize and require the county authorities to reexamine the question of compensation and fix the amount once each year. Carroll v. Ragsdale, 192 Ga. 118, 15 S.E.2d 210 (1941).

Cited in Tanner v. Rosser, 89 Ga. 811, 15 S.E. 750 (1892); Chambers v. State, 22 Ga. App. 748, 97 S.E. 256 (1918); Holloway v. State, 178 Ga. App. 141, 342 S.E.2d 363 (1986); Walden v. State, 185 Ga. App. 413, 364 S.E.2d 304 (1987); Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth. v. Partridge, 187 Ga. App. 637, 371 S.E.2d 185 (1988); Stinski v. State, 286 Ga. 839, 691 S.E.2d 854 (2010).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Uniformed members of Georgia State Patrol serving as jurors. - Uniformed members of the Georgia State Patrol who are subpoenaed and accepted for jury duty may legally accept payment pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of O.C.G.A.

§ 15-12-7 and should be placed on ‘‘court leave’’ while serving on a jury in accordance with the rules and regulations of the State Personnel Board. 1984 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 84-76.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 47 Am. Jur. 2d, Jury, § 100.

C.J.S. - 50A C.J.S., Juries, § 351.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1987–2024 · leading case: Stinski v. State, 691 S.E.2d 854 (Ga. 2010).
Stinski v. State, 691 S.E.2d 854 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 2× “Stinski has failed to show that financial compensation of all jurors at the level set by Georgia law resulted in the unconstitutional representation of any cognizable group or was unconstitutional in any other way.”
Walden v. State, 364 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 12× “Appellant made no attempt to show that two bailiffs had not served in her trial or that the total amount of $100 assessed as compensation for their services was excessive under OCGA § 15-12-7 (1). Her sole contention was that the State was not authorized to recover as “costs”…”
Young v. State, 860 S.E.2d 746 (Ga. 2021). · cites it 2× “The trial court did not err by refusing to compensate jurors beyond the amount authorized by OCGA § 15-12-7 (a) (2). See Stinski v. State, 286 Ga.”
Stephanie Lynn Bromaghim v. Lee Ann Ligon (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 3× “503 , the provisions in OCGA § 15-12-7 for compensation of jurors and bailiffs do not make such costs taxable to litigants.”
Young v. State (Ga. 2021). · cites it 2× “The trial court did not err by refusing to compensate jurors beyond the amount authorized by OCGA § 15-12-7 (a) (2). See Stinski v. State, 286 Ga.”
YOUNG v. THE STATE 6-24-2021 Substitute Opinion Issued. (Ga. 2021). · cites it 2× “The trial court did not err by refusing to compensate jurors beyond the amount authorized by OCGA § 15-12-7 (a) (2). See Stinski v. State, 286 Ga.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.