Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Orig. Code 1863, § 3846; Code 1868, § 3866; Ga. L. 1871-72, p. 47, § 4; Code 1873, § 3940; Ga. L. 1878-79, p. 190, § 1; Code 1882, § 3940; Ga. L. 1890-91, p. 80, § 1; Ga. L. 1895, p. 74, § 1; Penal Code 1895, § 872; Penal Code 1910, § 876; Ga. L. 1919, p. 104, § 1; Code 1933, § 59-120; Ga. L. 1946, p. 72, § 1; Ga. L. 1957, p. 43, § 1; Ga. L. 1966, p. 442, § 1; Ga. L. 1971, p. 205, § 1; Ga. L. 1972, p. 1132, § 1; Ga. L. 1974, p. 325, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 684, § 1; Ga. L. 1979, p. 601, § 1; Ga. L. 1981, p. 685, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 616, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 242, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 790, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 836, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1587, § 1; Ga. L. 2008, p. 168, § 1/HB 1086; Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-8/HB 415; Ga. L. 2014, p. 862, § 5/HB 1078.)
The 2014 amendment, effective April 29, 2014, inserted "trial or grand" near the beginning of the first sentence of paragraph (a)(2).
- Compensation of grand jurors and trial jurors, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. XI.
Discrimination against employee for attending a judicial proceeding in response to a court order or process, § 34-1-3.
- Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-1/HB 415, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Jury Composition Reform Act of 2011.'"
- This section reveals an intent to effectuate three purposes: (1) to fix by law a maximum for compensation of bailiffs; (2) to vest in the county authorities of each county the right to determine the amount of compensation in that county, not to exceed such maximum; and (3) to authorize and require the county authorities to reexamine the question of compensation and fix the amount once each year. Carroll v. Ragsdale, 192 Ga. 118, 15 S.E.2d 210 (1941).
Cited in Tanner v. Rosser, 89 Ga. 811, 15 S.E. 750 (1892); Chambers v. State, 22 Ga. App. 748, 97 S.E. 256 (1918); Holloway v. State, 178 Ga. App. 141, 342 S.E.2d 363 (1986); Walden v. State, 185 Ga. App. 413, 364 S.E.2d 304 (1987); Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth. v. Partridge, 187 Ga. App. 637, 371 S.E.2d 185 (1988); Stinski v. State, 286 Ga. 839, 691 S.E.2d 854 (2010).
- Uniformed members of the Georgia State Patrol who are subpoenaed and accepted for jury duty may legally accept payment pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of O.C.G.A. § 15-12-7 and should be placed on "court leave" while serving on a jury in accordance with the rules and regulations of the State Personnel Board. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-76.
- 47 Am. Jur. 2d, Jury, § 100.
- 50A C.J.S., Juries, § 351.
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-06-24
Snippet: jurors beyond the amount authorized by OCGA § 15-12-7 (a) (2). See Stinski v. State
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-06-01
Snippet: jurors beyond the amount authorized by OCGA § 15-12-7 (a) (2). See Stinski v. State
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-01
Citation: 691 S.E.2d 854, 286 Ga. 839, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 551, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 186
Snippet: unconstitutional in any other way. See OCGA § 15-12-7(a)(2); Ramirez v. State, 276 Ga. 158, 159-162(1)