O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-14-26 (2019)

Chairperson; election; term; rules and regulations

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The board shall each year elect from its members a chairperson, whose term shall be for one year, and who shall serve during the period for which elected and until a successor shall be elected. The board shall make all necessary rules and regulations to carry out this article, but the rules and regulations shall be subject to review by the Judicial Council.

History

(Ga. L. 1974, p. 345, § 7; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1315, § 7.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Judicial Council of Georgia and Board of Court Reporting were part of the judiciary and therefore excluded from coverage. - Judicial Council of Georgia and the Board of Court Reporting of the Judicial Council of Georgia fell within ‘‘the judiciary,’’ as that term

was used in O.C.G.A. § 50-13-2(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act, and therefore were exempt from the coverage of the Act and immune from a suit challenging a court reporter ethics rule the board adopted. Judicial Council v. Brown & Gallo, LLC, 288 Ga. 294, 702 S.E.2d 894 (2010).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Jud. Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLO, 702 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. 2010).
Jud. Council of Ga. v. BROWN & GALLO, 702 S.E.2d 894 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 4× “” It is without question that the Board and the Council are authorized by law to make rules and regulations with regard to the practice of court reporting in Georgia; the question presented is whether the Council, an agency of the judicial branch (OCGA § 15-14-23), and the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.