Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1904, p. 72, § 1; Civil Code 1910, § 323; Code 1933, § 24-2606; Ga. L. 1957, p. 273, §§ 1, 2, 3; Ga. L. 1962, p. 64, § 1; Ga. L. 1965, p. 528, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 113, § 1; Ga. L. 1972, p. 1015, § 408; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1402, § 9.1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 405, § 3; Ga. L. 2008, p. 577, § 3/SB 396; Ga. L. 2015, p. 919, § 1-3/HB 279.)
The 2015 amendment, in subsection (a), inserted "and may be as provided in Code Section 15-6-29.1" at the end of the first sentence and substituted "annual salary provided by Code Section 45-7-4 shall be paid" for "salary shall be paid" in the last sentence; and, in subsection (b), substituted "annual salary" for "salary so fixed" near the beginning and substituted "Code Sections 15-6-29.1, 15-6-30, and" for "Code Sections 15-6-30 and" near the end. See editor's note for effective date.
- Notice of intention to introduce local bills, § 28-1-14.
- Ga. L. 2015, p. 919, § 4-1(b), not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "(b)(1) Part I of this Act shall become effective only if funds are appropriated for purposes of Part I of this Act in an appropriations Act enacted at the 2015 regular session of the General Assembly.
"(2) If funds are so appropriated, then Part I of this Act shall become effective on July 1, 2015, for purposes of making the initial appointments of the Court of Appeals Judges created by Part I of this Act, and for all other purposes, Part I of this Act shall become effective on January 1, 2016.
"(3) If funds are not so appropriated, then Part I of this Act shall not become effective and shall stand repealed on July 1, 2015." Funds were appropriated at the 2015 session of the General Assembly.
- For article discussing judicial compensation, see 14 Ga. St. B. J. 110 (1978). For article, "Annual Survey of Georgia Law: June 1, 2015 - May 31, 2016: Special Contribution: Open Chambers Revisited: Demystifying the Inner Workings and Culture of the Georgia Court of Appeals," see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 1 (2016).
Cited in Stokes v. Fortson, 234 F. Supp. 575 (N.D. Ga. 1964).
- If there is a surplus in the operating account of the district attorneys, but if a warrant were paid in the full amount of the payroll for the superior court judges, a deficit would occur in the operating account of the superior court judges, the Department of Administrative Services may request and pay a warrant drawn on the account of the district attorney's operating account to cover the needed funds in the operating account of the superior court judges for the final payroll of the fiscal year. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-117.
- There is no violation of limitations on the judge's salary and allowances by receipt of travel expenses from state agency otherwise entitled to disburse such moneys. 1963-65 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 320.
- 46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judges, § 50 et seq.
- 48A C.J.S., Judges, § 84 et seq.
No results found for Georgia Code 15-6-29.