O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-12-105 (2019)

Penalty

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this Code section, any person who violates any provision of Code Section 16-12-103 or 16-12-104 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of a high and aggravated nature.

(b) Any person who violates subsection (a) of Code Section 16-12-103 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor if:

(1) The person depicted was at least 14 years of age;

(2) The items described in subsection (a) of Code Section 16-12-103 were furnished or disseminated with the permission of the minor depicted; and

(3) The defendant was 18 years of age or younger at the time of the offense.

History

Code 1981, § 16-12-105, enacted by Ga.

L. 1983, p. 1437, § 2; Ga. L. 2013, p. 663, § 4/HB 156.

ARTICLE 4 OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2009 · leading case: Metts v. State, 677 S.E.2d 377 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).
Metts v. State, 677 S.E.2d 377 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “6 OCGA § 16-12-103 (a) (1) provides: It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to sell or loan for monetary *337 consideration or otherwise furnish or disseminate to a minor: Any picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture, motion picture film, or similar visual representation…”
State v. Cafe Erotica, Inc., 500 S.E.2d 574 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 16-12-105. Appellee Cafe Erotica is a Peach County, Georgia, business establishment which provides food services 24 hours a day and adult entertainment in the form of dancers who may become nude or partially nude during their dance routines.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.