O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 17-10-61 (2019)

No execution upon determination of mental incompetency to be executed

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A person under sentence of death shall not be executed when it is determined under the provisions of this article that the person is mentally incompetent to be executed as defined in Code Section

History

Code 1981, § 17-10-61, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1003, § 2.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For note, ‘‘Ford v.

Wainwright: Eighth Amendment Prohibits Execution of the Insane,’’ see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 949 (1987).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Instructions to physician regarding insanity of one convicted of a capital felony. - In view of the fact that the inquiry under former Code 1933, § 27-2602 (see O.C.G.A. § 17-10-61) was directed to the alleged insanity occurring subsequent to the conviction, the definitions of insanity in former Code 1933, §§ 26-702 and 26-703 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 16-3-2 and 16-3-3) were inapplicable and should not be given in written instructions to physicians appointed pursuant to former Code 1933, § 27-2602. Those instructions should inform the physicians that the issue was the present sanity of the individual and should be determined on the basis of whether the

individual is capable of presently understanding the nature and object of the proceedings going on against the individual and rightly comprehends the individual’s own condition in reference to such proceedings, and was capable of rendering the individual’s attorneys such assistance as a proper defense to the proceedings preferred against the individual demands. Since the basic issue is the individual’s sanity at a time subsequent to conviction, or, in effect, the individual’s present sanity, the appropriate test should be that as employed upon a special plea of insanity under former Code 1933, § 27-1502 (see O.C.G.A. § 17-7-130). 1976 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 76-123.

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Propriety of carrying out death sentences against mentally ill individuals, 111 A.L.R.5th 491.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–1992 · leading case: Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). · cites it 2× “§ 54-101 (1985); Ga. Code Ann. § 17-10-61 (1982); Kan. Stat.”
State v. Perry, 610 So. 2d 746 (La. 1992). “07 (West 1985); Ga.Code Ann. § 17-10-61 to -63 (Harrison 1990); Ill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.