Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, this article provides the exclusive procedure for challenging mental competency to be executed when such challenge is made subsequent to the time of conviction and sentence.
(Code 1981, §17-10-62, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1003, § 2.)
- O.C.G.A. § 17-10-60 et seq. is the exclusive procedure for raising a mentally incompetent to be executed challenge after sentencing, O.C.G.A. § 17-10-62, and creates a rebuttable presumption against re-litigation of a finding of competency instead of applying the stricter habeas procedural default standard, O.C.G.A. § 17-10-69; accordingly, this issue should not arise in habeas proceedings in Georgia. Perkins v. Hall, 288 Ga. 810, 708 S.E.2d 335 (2011).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-03-18
Citation: 708 S.E.2d 335, 288 Ga. 810, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 758, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 255
Snippet: such a challenge after sentencing, see OCGA § 17-10-62, and creates a rebuttable presumption against
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-01-16
Citation: 261 Ga. 817, 411 S.E.2d 869, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 25
Snippet: 3. Contrary to the warden’s contention, OCGA § 17-10-62 et seq. is not applicable in this case because