Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 17-10-69 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 17-10-69 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 17-10-69

TITLE 17 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Section 10. Sentence and Punishment, 17-10-1 through 17-10-71.

ARTICLE 3 MENTALLY INCOMPETENT TO BE EXECUTED

17-10-69. Prior adjudication as presumption of mental competency.

If an applicant is determined to have previously filed an application under this article and has previously been determined to be mentally competent to be executed, such prior adjudication shall act as a presumption of mental competency and the applicant shall not be entitled to a new hearing on the question of mental competency to be executed absent the applicant's making a prima-facie showing of a substantial change in circumstances sufficient to raise a significant question as to the applicant's mental competency to be executed at the time of filing of any subsequent applications.

(Code 1981, §17-10-69, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1003, § 2.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Habeas corpus proceeding.

- O.C.G.A. § 17-10-60 et seq. is the exclusive procedure for raising a mentally incompetent to be executed challenge after sentencing, O.C.G.A. § 17-10-62, and creates a rebuttable presumption against re-litigation of a finding of competency instead of applying the stricter habeas procedural default standard, O.C.G.A. § 17-10-69; accordingly, this issue should not arise in habeas proceedings in Georgia. Perkins v. Hall, 288 Ga. 810, 708 S.E.2d 335 (2011).

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 17-10-69

Total Results: 1  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Perkins v. Hall, 708 S.E.2d 335 (Ga. 2011).

Cited 37 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 18, 2011 | 288 Ga. 810, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 758

...lusive procedure for raising such a challenge after sentencing, see OCGA § 17-10-62, and creates a rebuttable presumption against re-litigation of a finding of competency instead of applying the stricter habeas procedural default standard, see OCGA § 17-10-69....