O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-11-104 (2019)

Applicability

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A tribunal of Georgia shall apply Parts 1 through 6 and, as applicable, Part 7 of this article to a support proceeding involving:

(1) A foreign support order;

(2) A foreign tribunal; or

(3) An obligee, obligor, or child residing in a foreign country.

(b) A tribunal of Georgia that is requested to recognize and enforce a support order on the basis of comity may apply the procedural and substantive provisions of Parts 1 through 6 of this article.

(c) Part 7 of this article applies only to a support proceeding under the convention. In such a proceeding, if a provision of Part 7 of this article is inconsistent with Parts 1 through 6 of this article, Part 7 of this article controls.

History

Code 1981, § 19-11-104, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 705, § 1/SB 193.

PART 2 JURISDICTION; COOPERATION BETWEEN STATES

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Ross v. Ross, 805 S.E.2d 7 (Ga. 2017).
Ross v. Ross, 805 S.E.2d 7 (Ga. 2017). · cites it 2× “See 28 USC § 1738B (a) (1); OCGA §§ 19-11-104 (b); 19-11-110 (a) (1).”
Ross v. Ross (Ga. 2017). · cites it 2× “See 28 USC §1738B (a) (1); OCGA §§ 19-11-104 (b); 19-11- 110 (a) (1).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.