O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 19-11-136 (2019)
Communication between tribunals
✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A tribunal in Georgia may communicate with a tribunal outside this state in a record, or by telephone, e-mail, or other means, to obtain information concerning the laws, the legal effect of a judgment, decree, or order of that tribunal, and the status of a proceeding. A tribunal in Georgia may furnish similar information by similar means to a tribunal outside this state.
History
Code 1981, § 19-11-136, enacted by Ga.
L. 1997, p. 1613 § 33; Ga. L. 2013, p. 705, § 1/SB 193.
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Cited in Anderson Anesthesia, Inc. v. Anderson, 333 Ga. App. 437, 776 S.E.2d 647 (2015).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Anderson Anesthesia, Inc. v. Anderson, 776 S.E.2d 647 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).
Anderson Anesthesia, Inc. v. Anderson, 776 S.E.2d 647 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). “” The First Order also stated that the Georgia trial court nevertheless attempted to confer with the Louisiana court that issued the Income-Withholding Order pursuant to the provisions of the UIFSA, OCGA § 19-11-136, but was unable to reach the Louisiana judge presiding over the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.