Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §19-8-16, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 1572, § 5; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1640, § 7; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 19; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2505, § 1; Ga. L. 2003, p. 503, § 5; Ga. L. 2007, p. 42, § 1/SB 61; Ga. L. 2009, p. 453, § 2-4/HB 228; Ga. L. 2018, p. 19, § 1-1/HB 159.)
- For information as to the delayed amendment of this article, see the delayed effective date note at the beginning of this article.
The 2018 amendment, effective September 1, 2018, rewrote this Code section.
- For article surveying developments in Georgia domestic relations law from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 109 (1981).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under Ga. L. 1941, p. 300, § 7 and former § 19-8-11, as enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 201, § 1, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Many of the cases cited below were decided prior to the amendments by Ga. L. 1992, p. 2505, § 1, which substituted references to "child-placing agency" for references to "department".
- While former § 19-8-11 required that the Department of Human Resources file an investigative report in adoption proceedings, failure to obtain this report from the agency was not reversible error. Chandler v. Cochran, 247 Ga. 184, 275 S.E.2d 23 (1981)(decided under former § 19-8-11, as enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 201, § 1).
Father's failure to request access to investigation report upon which the trial court relied in granting adoption to the grandparents, or to subpoena the investigator for examination at the hearing, constituted waiver of the father's right to do so. Cafagno v. Hagan, 213 Ga. App. 631, 445 S.E.2d 380 (1994).
- Trial court did not commit reversible error in entering judgment terminating a natural father's parental rights and granting an adoption petition by the mother's husband without first requiring an investigation by the Department of Human Resources as was provided for in former § 19-8-11. In re C.D.B., 182 Ga. App. 263, 355 S.E.2d 759 (1987) (decided under former § 19-8-11, as enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 201, § 1).
- Statute relating to adoption of children is perfectly clear that it was the intention of the legislature to provide the judge at an interlocutory adoption hearing with information obtained from the investigation by the Department of Human Resources for the judge's consideration in deciding the issue. Cox v. Bohannon, 86 Ga. App. 236, 71 S.E.2d 440 (1952) (decided under Ga. L. 1941, p. 300, § 7 prior to revision of chapter by Ga. L. 1977, p. 201).
- Although the Department of Human Resources was statutorily required to prepare a report and recommendation concerning the adoption petition, there was no requirement that the report be entered into evidence, and therefore the lack of such a report in the record was not reversible error. Baugh v. Robinson, 179 Ga. App. 571, 346 S.E.2d 918 (1986) (decided under former § 19-8-11, as enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 201, § 1).
Cited in Motes v. Love, 202 Ga. App. 749, 415 S.E.2d 334 (1992).
- 2 Am. Jur. 2d, Adoption, § 113.
- 2 C.J.S., Adoption of Persons, §§ 46, 48.
No results found for Georgia Code 19-8-16.1.