Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 21-2-527 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 21 ELECTIONS

Section 2. Elections and Primaries Generally, 21-2-1 through 21-2-604.

ARTICLE 13 CONTESTED ELECTIONS AND PRIMARIES

21-2-527. Pronouncement of judgment; effect of finding of misconduct by poll officers; calling of second primary, election, or runoff by court upon finding of defects.

  1. After hearing the allegations and evidence in the contest, the court shall declare as nominated, elected, or as eligible to compete in a run-off primary or election that qualified candidate who received the requisite number of votes and shall pronounce judgment accordingly; and the clerk of the superior court shall certify such determination to the proper authority. In the case of a contest involving a question submitted to electors at an election, the court shall pronounce judgment as to whether the same was approved or disapproved; and the clerk of the superior court shall certify such determination to the defendant.
  2. When a defendant who has received the requisite number of votes for nomination, election, or to compete in a run-off primary or election is determined to be ineligible for the nomination or office sought, the court shall pronounce judgment declaring the primary or election invalid with regard to such nomination or office and shall call a second primary or election to fill such nomination or office and shall set the date for such second primary or election.
  3. If misconduct is complained of on the part of the poll officers of any precinct, it shall not be held sufficient to set aside the contested result unless the rejection of the vote of such precinct would change such result.
  4. Whenever the court trying a contest shall determine that the primary, election, or runoff is so defective as to the nomination, office, or eligibility in contest as to place in doubt the result of the entire primary, election, or runoff for such nomination, office, or eligibility, such court shall declare the primary, election, or runoff to be invalid with regard to such nomination, office, or eligibility and shall call for a second primary, election, or runoff to be conducted among all of the same candidates who participated in the primary, election, or runoff to fill such nomination or office which was declared invalid and shall set the date for such second primary, election, or runoff.

(Code 1933, § 34-1708, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1512, § 5; Ga. L. 1987, p. 34, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1360, § 19; Ga. L. 1991, p. 133, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1027, § 17; Ga. L. 1997, p. 590, § 40; Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Extent of jurisdiction over primary contest.

- In a contest of a the primary election, trial court's jurisdiction is limited strictly to the primary, and the court is not authorized to interfere with the holding of the subsequent general election. Smiley v. Gaskin, 115 Ga. App. 547, 154 S.E.2d 740 (1967).

What contestant must show.

- If the contestant can sustain charges, or enough of them to cast doubt upon whether the election was fairly and lawfully conducted, it should be voided and another held. If the contestant cannot, the election should stand. Nichols v. Acree, 112 Ga. App. 287, 145 S.E.2d 92 (1965).

Persons who may compete in rerun.

- The ordering of a rerun of a primary, after a contest in a race is sustained, is no reason for permitting other persons, who were not properly qualified to run in the contested primary, to qualify and compete in the rerun. Ingram v. Lott, 238 Ga. 513, 233 S.E.2d 770 (1977).

Overruling of a general demurrer (since abolished) to an election contest proceeding is appealable. Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392 (1967).

Improperly cast ballots must affect race in question.

- Where contestant established that 131 absentee ballots were not properly cast in the general election, but the contestant did not establish that any of the improper absentee ballots were cast in the contested race, the contestant was unable to place in doubt the result of the election, and the trial court correctly found in favor of the winner as certified by the county superintendent of election. Bailey v. Colwell, 263 Ga. 111, 428 S.E.2d 570 (1993).

Cited in Broome v. Martin, 111 Ga. App. 51, 140 S.E.2d 500 (1965); Hollifield v. Vickers, 118 Ga. App. 229, 162 S.E.2d 905 (1968); Lowe v. Weltner, 118 Ga. App. 635, 164 S.E.2d 919 (1968); Henderson v. County Bd. of Registration & Elections, 126 Ga. App. 280, 190 S.E.2d 633 (1972); Carroll v. Cates, 134 Ga. App. 10, 213 S.E.2d 120 (1975); Miller v. Kilpatrick, 140 Ga. App. 193, 230 S.E.2d 328 (1976); Hammill v. Valentine, 258 Ga. 603, 373 S.E.2d 9 (1988); Haynes v. Wells, 273 Ga. 106, 538 S.E.2d 430 (2000); Fuller v. Thomas, 284 Ga. 397, 667 S.E.2d 587 (2008).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Voters in rerun election.

- When a rerun of an election is ordered by a judge of the superior court as a result of the sustaining of an election contest, the rerun election should be limited to those voters who were qualified to vote in the original election. 1985 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 85-14.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 432.

C.J.S.

- 29 C.J.S., Elections, § 517 et seq.

ALR.

- Constitutionality, construction, and application of statute which declares a defeated candidate for nomination ineligible as a candidate at general election, or prohibits printing his name on official ballot, 143 A.L.R. 603.

Treatment of excess or illegal ballots when it is not known for which candidate or on which side of a proposition they were cast, 155 A.L.R. 677.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 21-2-527 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 9

MILLER v. HODGE

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-08-13

Snippet: issues related to a previous one. See OCGA § 21- 2-527 (d) (providing for when a primary, election,

Fuller v. Thomas

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-10-06

Citation: 667 S.E.2d 587, 284 Ga. 397, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3149, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 807

Snippet: eligible to compete in the runoff. See OCGA § 21-2-527(a). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur

Mead v. Sheffield

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-09-02

Citation: 601 S.E.2d 99, 278 Ga. 268, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2865, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 592

Snippet: considered and found to be without merit. OCGA § 21-2-527 (d) provides that, [w]henever the court trying

Howell v. Fears

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-10-15

Citation: 571 S.E.2d 392, 275 Ga. 627, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2966, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 929

Snippet: were only cast in Precinct 9. We disagree. OCGA § 21-2-527(d) provides: Whenever the court trying a contest

Haynes v. Wells

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-11-01

Citation: 538 S.E.2d 430, 273 Ga. 106, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4018, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 824

Snippet: See OCGA § 21-2-132 (e) (4). Although OCGA § 21-2-527 (b) provides that when a court determines that

Caplan v. Hattaway

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-06-01

Citation: 501 S.E.2d 195, 269 Ga. 582, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 1850, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 574

Snippet: the run-off election was held. However, OCGA § 21-2-527 provides for the trial court's "pronouncement

Bailey v. Colwell

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-05-03

Citation: 428 S.E.2d 570, 263 Ga. 111, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1766, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 400, 1993 WL 139338

Snippet: doubt the result of the ... election...." OCGA § 21-2-527 (d). [T]o cast doubt on an election it is only

Hammill v. Valentine

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-10-21

Citation: 258 Ga. 603, 373 S.E.2d 9, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 423

Snippet: OCGA § 21-2-522 (3). In compliance with OCGA § 21-2-527 (d), the trial judge declared the election invalid

Daniel v. Barrow

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1986-10-08

Citation: 256 Ga. 318, 348 S.E.2d 649

Snippet: agree with the court’s interpretation of OCGA § 21-2-527 or that the proper remedy for such irregularities