Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 34-1708, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1512, § 5; Ga. L. 1987, p. 34, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 1360, § 19; Ga. L. 1991, p. 133, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1027, § 17; Ga. L. 1997, p. 590, § 40; Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1.)
- In a contest of a the primary election, trial court's jurisdiction is limited strictly to the primary, and the court is not authorized to interfere with the holding of the subsequent general election. Smiley v. Gaskin, 115 Ga. App. 547, 154 S.E.2d 740 (1967).
- If the contestant can sustain charges, or enough of them to cast doubt upon whether the election was fairly and lawfully conducted, it should be voided and another held. If the contestant cannot, the election should stand. Nichols v. Acree, 112 Ga. App. 287, 145 S.E.2d 92 (1965).
- The ordering of a rerun of a primary, after a contest in a race is sustained, is no reason for permitting other persons, who were not properly qualified to run in the contested primary, to qualify and compete in the rerun. Ingram v. Lott, 238 Ga. 513, 233 S.E.2d 770 (1977).
Overruling of a general demurrer (since abolished) to an election contest proceeding is appealable. Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392 (1967).
- Where contestant established that 131 absentee ballots were not properly cast in the general election, but the contestant did not establish that any of the improper absentee ballots were cast in the contested race, the contestant was unable to place in doubt the result of the election, and the trial court correctly found in favor of the winner as certified by the county superintendent of election. Bailey v. Colwell, 263 Ga. 111, 428 S.E.2d 570 (1993).
Cited in Broome v. Martin, 111 Ga. App. 51, 140 S.E.2d 500 (1965); Hollifield v. Vickers, 118 Ga. App. 229, 162 S.E.2d 905 (1968); Lowe v. Weltner, 118 Ga. App. 635, 164 S.E.2d 919 (1968); Henderson v. County Bd. of Registration & Elections, 126 Ga. App. 280, 190 S.E.2d 633 (1972); Carroll v. Cates, 134 Ga. App. 10, 213 S.E.2d 120 (1975); Miller v. Kilpatrick, 140 Ga. App. 193, 230 S.E.2d 328 (1976); Hammill v. Valentine, 258 Ga. 603, 373 S.E.2d 9 (1988); Haynes v. Wells, 273 Ga. 106, 538 S.E.2d 430 (2000); Fuller v. Thomas, 284 Ga. 397, 667 S.E.2d 587 (2008).
- When a rerun of an election is ordered by a judge of the superior court as a result of the sustaining of an election contest, the rerun election should be limited to those voters who were qualified to vote in the original election. 1985 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 85-14.
- 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 432.
- 29 C.J.S., Elections, § 517 et seq.
- Constitutionality, construction, and application of statute which declares a defeated candidate for nomination ineligible as a candidate at general election, or prohibits printing his name on official ballot, 143 A.L.R. 603.
Treatment of excess or illegal ballots when it is not known for which candidate or on which side of a proposition they were cast, 155 A.L.R. 677.
Total Results: 9
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-08-13
Snippet: issues related to a previous one. See OCGA § 21- 2-527 (d) (providing for when a primary, election,
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-10-06
Citation: 667 S.E.2d 587, 284 Ga. 397, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3149, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 807
Snippet: eligible to compete in the runoff. See OCGA § 21-2-527(a). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-09-02
Citation: 601 S.E.2d 99, 278 Ga. 268, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2865, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 592
Snippet: considered and found to be without merit. OCGA § 21-2-527 (d) provides that, [w]henever the court trying
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-10-15
Citation: 571 S.E.2d 392, 275 Ga. 627, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2966, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 929
Snippet: were only cast in Precinct 9. We disagree. OCGA § 21-2-527(d) provides: Whenever the court trying a contest
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-11-01
Citation: 538 S.E.2d 430, 273 Ga. 106, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4018, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 824
Snippet: See OCGA § 21-2-132 (e) (4). Although OCGA § 21-2-527 (b) provides that when a court determines that
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-06-01
Citation: 501 S.E.2d 195, 269 Ga. 582, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 1850, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 574
Snippet: the run-off election was held. However, OCGA § 21-2-527 provides for the trial court's "pronouncement
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-05-03
Citation: 428 S.E.2d 570, 263 Ga. 111, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1766, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 400, 1993 WL 139338
Snippet: doubt the result of the ... election...." OCGA § 21-2-527 (d). [T]o cast doubt on an election it is only
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-10-21
Citation: 258 Ga. 603, 373 S.E.2d 9, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 423
Snippet: OCGA § 21-2-522 (3). In compliance with OCGA § 21-2-527 (d), the trial judge declared the election invalid
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1986-10-08
Citation: 256 Ga. 318, 348 S.E.2d 649
Snippet: agree with the court’s interpretation of OCGA § 21-2-527 or that the proper remedy for such irregularities