O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 21-2-528 (2019)

Appeals from court’s determination on contest petition

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An appeal from the final determination of the court may be taken within ten days from the rendition thereof as in other civil cases. The filing of a notice of appeal shall not act as a stay or supersedeas. The appellant may apply to the appellate court for a stay or supersedeas, and such court shall consider applications for stays or supersedeas in such cases without regard to whether any notice of appeal has been filed or the record docketed in such cases.

History

Code 1933, § 34-1709, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 590, § 41; Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1; Ga. L. 2003, p. 517, § 60; Ga. L. 2016, p. 883, § 3-7/HB 927.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2016, p. 883, § 1-1/HB 927, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “This Act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Appellate Jurisdiction Reform Act of 2016.’”

Ga. L. 2016, p. 883, § 6-1/HB 927, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “Part III of this Act shall become effective on January 1, 2017, and shall apply to cases in which a notice of appeal or application to appeal is filed on or after such date.” Law reviews. For article on the 2016 amendment of this Code section, see 33 Georgia St. U. L. Rev. 205 (2016).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Election contest is a civil case. Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1074 (1967). Georgia Supreme Court’s decision in Kendall v. Delaney, 282 Ga. 482 (2007) is an outlier in Georgia’s general election case law and relies solely on cases involving primary election challenges without acknowledging the distinction between primary and general elections and is overruled; to the extent that Scoggins v. Collins, 288 Ga. 26 (2010) implies that a

general election challenge will be moot if a party fails to seek a stay or supersedeas pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 21-2-528, it is disapproved. Parham v. Stewart, 308 Ga. 170, 839 S.E.2d 605, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 128 (2020). What contestant must show. - If the contestant can sustain the charges, or enough of them to cast doubt upon whether the election was fairly and lawfully conducted, it should be voided and another held. If the contestant cannot, the election should stand. Nichols v. Acree,

ELECTIONS & PRIMARIES

112 Ga. App. 287, 145 S.E.2d 92, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 672 (1965). Appeal of contestant to city council election dismissed as moot. - The appeal of a contestant to a city council election was dismissed as moot because the contestant failed to move to expedite consideration of an appeal in view of an impending election, and the Supreme Court of Georgia finally heard the appeal after the election had already occurred and the term of office for the seat at issue had expired. Allen v. Yost, 282 Ga. 865, 655 S.E.2d 580, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 21 (2008). Appeal from order dismissing challenge to primary election dismissed as moot. - Because the record showed that an unsuccessful candidate in a primary election waited nearly a month and a half to challenge that election, request a stay of the general election, or petition the Supreme Court of Georgia for an expedited appeal, the mootness doctrine applied to the challenge requiring dismissal of the appeal. McCreary v. Martin, 281 Ga. 668, 642 S.E.2d 80, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 168 (2007).

Finding that the appellant failed to show that enough illegal votes had been cast to change or place in doubt the result of the mayoral election was upheld because the appellant failed to show that one voter was not a resident of the city, that another was inappropriately offered something of value in exchange for a vote, and that another voter was incompetent to vote in the mayoral election thereby making their votes valid. Parham v. Stewart, 308 Ga. 170, 839 S.E.2d 605, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 128 (2020). Appeal of election contests. - While the established rule in Georgia is that a primary election contest becomes moot after the general election has taken place, the Georgia Supreme Court has routinely decided general election challenges on the merits, regardless of whether a stay or supersedeas was requested or obtained. Parham v. Stewart, 308 Ga. 170, 839 S.E.2d 605, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 128 (2020). Overruling of a general demurrer (since abolished) to an election contest proceeding is appealable. Blackburn v. Hall, 115 Ga. App. 235, 154 S.E.2d 392, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 1074 (1967).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, §§ 429, 430.

C.J.S. 29 C.J.S., Elections, § 547 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2023 · leading case: Parham v. Stewart, 839 S.E.2d 605 (Ga. 2020).
Parham v. Stewart, 839 S.E.2d 605 (Ga. 2020). · cites it 6× “5 Indeed, 4 OCGA § 21-2-528 states as follows: An appeal from the final determination of the [trial] court may be taken within ten days from the rendition thereof as in other civil cases.”
Scoggins v. Collins, 701 S.E.2d 134 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 8× “See OCGA § 21-2-524(a) (petition timely if filed within five days of official consolidation of returns or within five days of certification of results after recount); OCGA § 21-2-528 (allowing request for extraordinary relief even prior to filing of notice of appeal or docketing…”
Payne v. Chatman, 485 S.E.2d 723 (Ga. 1997). · cites it 6× “This legislation provides an important procedural framework for the prompt resolution of election contests, including initiation and notice of an election contest (OCGA § 21-2-524), a timely hearing (OCGA § 21-2-525) and an appeal from the final decision of the trial court (OCGA…”
McCreary v. Martin, 642 S.E.2d 80 (Ga. 2007). · cites it 4× “In fact, OCGA § 21-2-528 4 allows a request for extraordinary relief from this Court even prior to the filing of a notice of appeal or the docketing of the record in an appeal from a final determination in an election contest.”
Caplan v. Hattaway, 501 S.E.2d 195 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 6× “Caplan neither prepared a written order for entry by the trial court nor applied to this Court for a stay or supersedeas pursuant to OCGA § 21-2-528. The run-off election was held on November 25, as scheduled, and Mr.”
Dawkins-Haigler v. Anderson, 799 S.E.2d 180 (Ga. 2017). · cites it 2× “While “OCGA § 21-2-528 allows a request for extraordinary relief from this Court even prior to the filing of a notice of appeal or the docketing of the record in an appeal from a final determination in an election contest,” see McCreary v.”
Williams v. Heard, 805 S.E.2d 1 (Ga. 2017). · cites it 2× “Although Heard argues that as the appellee in this action she was without the remedy provided to an appellant under OCGA § 21-2-528, she did not avail herself of any extraordinary or expedited relief in the trial court or this Court.”
Kendall v. Delaney, 651 S.E.2d 685 (Ga. 2007). · cites it 4× “, that two voter assistants took ballots from voters and placed them in the mail) were not “irregularities] affecting the lawfulness of the ballot[s] to the extent that [they] should be discounted or thrown out,” and that, in any event, Kendall could show only 42 such ballots…”
Hilliard v. Baldwin, 710 S.E.2d 143 (Ga. 2011). · cites it 2× “In fact, OCGA § 21-2-528 allows a request for extraordinary relief from this Court even prior to the filing of a notice of appeal or the docketing of the record in an appeal from a final determination in an election contest.”
Corey B. Morgan v. Brenda Cross (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “Morgan, a candidate for City Council of the City of Camilla, has petitioned this Court for a stay pending appeal pursuant to OCGA § 21-2-528. Morgan is listed on the ballot for City Council, but the local elections superintendent concluded that his name will be removed because…”
Venterra Pollard v. David Cooper (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 4× “See OCGA § 21-2-528. But Petitioners have not cited, and we have not found, anything in the specific statutes 5 There are numerous appellate cases holding that there is no automatic supersedeas in an appeal from an order granting an injunction.”
Williams v. Heard (Ga. 2017). · cites it 2× “Although Heard argues that as the appellee in this action she was without the remedy provided to an appellant under OCGA § 21-2-528, she did not avail herself of any extraordinary or expedited relief in the trial court or this Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.