O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 21-2-567 (2019)

Intimidation of electors

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any person who uses or threatens to use force and violence, or acts in any other manner to intimidate any other person, to: (1) Vote or refrain from voting at any primary or election, or to vote or refrain from voting for or against any particular candidate or question submitted to electors at such primary or election; or (2) Place or refrain from placing his or her name upon a register of electors shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not less than one nor more than ten years or to pay a fine not to exceed $100,000.00, or both. (b) As used in this Code section, the term “acts in any other manner to intimidate” means to undertake or pursue a knowing and willful course of conduct which causes emotional distress by placing another person in reasonable fear for such person’s safety or for the safety of another person and which serves no legitimate purpose.

History

Code 1933, § 34-1934, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1998, p.

295, § 1; Ga. L. 2007, p. 536, § 6/SB 40; Ga. L. 2008, p. 781, § 17/HB 1112.

Annotations

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Fingerprinting required. - An offense under O.C.G.A. § 21-2-567 would be

designated as one which requires fingerprinting. 1998 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 98-20.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 454.

C.J.S. 29 C.J.S., Elections, § 576.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Middleton v. Smith, 539 S.E.2d 163 (Ga. 2000).
Middleton v. Smith, 539 S.E.2d 163 (Ga. 2000). · cites it 4× “BENHAM, Chief Justice, dissenting. The majority opinion in this case shows the danger of focusing so completely on individual trees that the forest cannot be seen.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.