Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §21-5-30, enacted by Ga. L. 1986, p. 957, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 297, § 9; Ga. L. 1987, p. 458, § 2; Ga. L. 1988, p. 603, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 922, § 2; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1075, § 4; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1402, § 18; Ga. L. 1994, p. 258, §§ 2, 3; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1092, § 1; Ga. L. 2005, p. 859, § 10/HB 48; Ga. L. 2006, p. 69, § 1/SB 467; Ga. L. 2010, p. 863, § 3/SB 296; Ga. L. 2010, p. 1173, § 10/SB 17; Ga. L. 2011, p. 569, § 1/SB 160; Ga. L. 2014, p. 9, § 1/SB 297.)
The 2006 amendment, effective April 14, 2006, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, in subsection (a), substituted "directly to or by a candidate" for "directly to a candidate" near the beginning, and substituted "except directly to or by a campaign committee" for "except directly by a campaign committee" near the end.
The 2010 amendments. The first 2010 amendment, effective July 1, 2010, substituted "state treasurer" for "director of the Office of Treasury and Fiscal Services" in the middle of the second sentence of subsection (e). The second 2010 amendment, effective January 10, 2011, substituted "$100.00" for "$101.00" in the first sentence of subsection (d); and deleted "or appropriate local filing officer" following "with the commission" in subsection (g). See Editor's notes for applicability.
The 2011 amendment, effective May 12, 2011, rewrote subsection (f).
The 2014 amendment, effective January 31, 2014, in subsection (g), added the proviso at the end of the first sentence, and added the last sentence.
- Ga. L. 2005, p. 859, § 28, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the Act shall not apply to any violation occurring prior to January 9, 2006.
Ga. L. 2010, p. 1173, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Act of 2010.'"
Ga. L. 2010, p. 1173, § 30, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that the amendment to this Code section applies to all reports filed on and after January 10, 2011.
- For article, "Georgia Campaign Finance and Disclosure Law," see 27 Ga. St. B.J. 175 (1991). For article on 2005 amendment of this Code section, see 22 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 119 (2005). For note on 1992 amendment of this Code section, see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 247 (1992).
- Due to the similarity of provisions and the possible continuing applicability of decisions under the former chapter (see Code Section 21-5-10), decisions under the former chapter are included in the annotations to this Code section.
Subsection (e) is not unconstitutional, as it does not take private property without compensation. An anonymous contribution never becomes the property of the candidate or the candidate's committee. Fortson v. Weeks, 232 Ga. 472, 208 S.E.2d 68 (1974) (decided under provisions of Ga. L. 1974, p. 155 similar to subsection (e) of this Code section).
- Candidate charged with failure to report certain "common source" contributions, as defined by O.C.G.A. § 21-5-30, could not be penalized for such failure, even though the candidate knew the contributions were from a common source, where it was the candidate's campaign treasurer who was unaware of the common source of the contributions and who filed the campaign report as authorized by O.C.G.A. § 21-5-34(a)(3). State Ethics Comm'r v. Moore, 214 Ga. App. 236, 447 S.E.2d 687 (1994).
- Attorney who delivered an anonymous campaign contribution on behalf of a client was improperly held in contempt for failing to disclose the client's name to the State Ethics Commission; the attorney invoked the self-incrimination privilege, and the trial court found the attorney in contempt without first determining whether the Commission's proposed questions might have been incriminating. Begner v. State Ethics Comm'n, 250 Ga. App. 327, 552 S.E.2d 431 (2001).
- Due to the similarity of provisions and the possible continuing applicability of opinions of the Attorney General decided under the former chapter (see Op. Att'y Gen. No. 86-50 and Code Section 21-5-10), opinions decided under the former chapter are included in the annotations to this Code section.
- The prohibition against for-hire motor carriers regulated by the Public Service Commission from contributing to a political campaign is still applicable despite the partial preemption provisions contained in the Federal Aviation Administration Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-305, § 601. 1996 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 96-1.
- Campaign committees must register with the Secretary of State at the time the committee is formed, regardless of the amount of money to be raised or expended. 1985 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 85-51 (decided under the former chapter).
- Assuming campaign contributions are made by state banks, there is no dollar amount that must be disclosed to the State Campaign and Financial Disclosure Commission (now the State Ethics Commission). 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-109 (decided under the former chapter).
Private carriers are not included within the purview of the Public Service Commission's general supervision, and are not subject to the prohibition against political contributions set forth in O.C.G.A. § 21-5-30 (f). 1990 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-32.
- Due to the similarity of the provisions of former Code Section 21-5-10 to subsection (f) of this Code section and the possible continuing applicability of opinions of the Attorney General decided under that former Code section (see Op. Att'y Gen. No. 86-50 and Code Section 21-5-10), opinions decided under former Code Section 21-5-10 are included in the annotations to this Code section.
- Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62, as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120, 1127 does not unconstitutionally infringe guarantees of freedom of speech and association. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-56 (decided under Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62 as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120, 1127).
Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62, as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120, 1127 does not unconstitutionally deny equal protection to common carriers. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-56 (decided under Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62 as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120, 1127).
The differential treatment between regulated and nonregulated corporations imposed by Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62, as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120-1127 can be justified on the ground that in granting and protecting the monopolies of public utilities, the state has the duty also to see that the power so granted is not abused and does not even appear to have a corrupting influence on the political process. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-56 (decided under Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62 as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120, 1127).
- "Public utility" is a business organization which regularly supplies the public with some commodity or service; "regulated" is defined in former Code 1933, § 93-307 (see O.C.G.A. § 46-2-20). 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-53.
- An electric membership corporation falls within the definition of a "public utility corporation, regulated by the Public Service Commission." 1985 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U85-35.
"Common carrier of persons or property" is a "public utility". 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-56 (decided under Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62 as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120, 1127).
- Public utility corporations regulated by the Public Service Commission are prohibited under the Campaign and Financial Disclosure Act, O.C.G.A. Ch. 5, T. 21, from rendering logistical assistance, including utility-compensated employee services of any kind, to a political campaign. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 83-1.
Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62 as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120, 1127 is a strict prohibition of any person acting on behalf of a regulated utility from making any contribution to any political campaign. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-56 (decided under Ga. L. 1974, pp. 155-62 as amended by Ga. L. 1975, pp. 1120, 1127).
- The value of any services performed by employees of a regulated public utility corporation on behalf of a campaign would constitute prohibited contributions, if those employees are performing such services on company time, while they are on duty, drawing or eligible for their salary or hourly pay. This would include a situation in which a regulated public utility employee collects personal contributions from other employees and forwards those contributions to a political campaign, if this activity is being done on company time. It would also apply to secretarial or any other services performed toward this end. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 83-1.
Attorneys who represent regulated public utilities are prohibited from making contributions to political campaigns on behalf of the regulated public utility, but are not prohibited from contributing to political campaigns in their personal capacity. 1986 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U86-34.
- Former § 21-5-10 did not prohibit political action committees, formed and operated pursuant to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, and funded by voluntary personal contributions from employees and persons affiliated with public utility corporations regulated by the Public Service Commission, which do not receive any assistance whatsoever from the regulated public utility corporation, from making political contributions to state and local political campaigns in Georgia; however, each situation must be determined on its own factual basis. 1986 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 86-2.
- Former Code 1933, § 40-3808.2 does not prohibit a public utility regulated by the Public Service Commission from contributing to efforts to publicize views with respect to a referendum on the imposition of a county sales tax. 1979 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 79-54 (decided under former Code 1933, § 40-3808.2).
- 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 462 et seq.
- 29 C.J.S., Elections §§ 350 et seq., 562 et seq.
- Solicitation or receipt of funds by public officer or employee for political campaign expenses or similar purposes as bribery, 55 A.L.R.2d 1137.
Constitutional validity of state or local regulation of contributions by or to political action committees, 24 A.L.R.6th 179.
Construction and application of Supreme Court's holding in Citizens United v. Federal Election Com'n, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753, 187 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2961, 159 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P 10166 (2010), that government may not prohibit independent and indirect corporate expenditures on political speech, 65 A.L.R.6th 503.
Construction and application of Supreme Court's holding in Citizens United v. Federal Election Com'n, 130 S. Ct. 876, 175 L. Ed. 2d 753, 187 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2961, 159 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P 10166 (2010), that government may not prohibit independent and indirect corporate expenditures on political speech, 65 A.L.R.6th 503.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-11-16
Citation: 298 Ga. 241, 779 S.E.2d 624
Snippet: Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission. See OCGA § 21-5-30 (b). 9 If there is a vacancy in either
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-03-15
Citation: 426 S.E.2d 890, 262 Ga. 855, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1260, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 318
Snippet: "Ethics in Government Act," specifically OCGA § 21-5-30.1,[1] by placing a full-page newspaper ad supporting