Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §29-4-70, enacted by Ga. L. 2004, p. 161, § 1.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-11 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- After the probate court granted wife's petition for guardianship over her husband, the superior court correctly dismissed an appeal by the adult children of the husband because they did not file a petition for guardianship under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-6 and did not hold any other status under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-11(a). Twitty v. Akers, 218 Ga. App. 467, 462 S.E.2d 418 (1995) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-11).
Cited in Snider v. Lavender, 164 Ga. App. 591, 298 S.E.2d 582 (1982); In re Jenkins, 169 Ga. App. 408, 313 S.E.2d 119 (1984); Barmore v. Himebaugh, 200 Ga. App. 868, 410 S.E.2d 46 (1991).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-11 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-11(d), the probate courts which were authorized to hold jury trials under Ga. L. 1986, p. 982, would not be authorized to appoint an emergency guardian pending appeal. 1986 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U86-18 (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-11).
- An appeal from those emergency guardianship orders which can be considered "final orders" will act as supersedeas upon payment of the costs by the appellant. 1986 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U86-18 (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-11).
No results found for Georgia Code 29-4-70.