Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 3-4-3 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 3 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES

Section 4. Distilled Spirits, 3-4-1 through 3-4-180.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

3-4-3. Retail dealer's signs; signs advertising Georgia lottery.

  1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this Code section, a licensed retail dealer in distilled spirits may display at the licensee's place of business unilluminated signs, using letters not larger than eight inches in height, flat against the outside of the building, below the roof line, bearing the words "liquor," "beer," "wine," "champagne," or any combination thereof, and "package store" or "liquor store," together with the trade name of the retail dealer.In addition to such signs flat against the outside of the building, the retail dealer may display at a location on the tract of property upon which the business is located, but not affixed to the building, one unilluminated sign using letters not larger than eight inches in height bearing the words "package store" or "liquor store" and the trade name of the retail dealer.Subject to any more restrictive size limitations contained in the ordinances of the political subdivision in which the place of business is located, a sign not affixed to the building may be no larger than 16 square feet in area.
  2. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this Code section, the commissioner shall be authorized by rules and regulations to permit licensed retail dealers in distilled spirits to display signs inside and outside their retail establishments which advertise or promote any lottery authorized under Chapter 27 of Title 50, the "Georgia Lottery for Education Act," provided that such signs are in compliance with said Chapter 27 of Title 50 and the rules and regulations of the board of directors of the Georgia Lottery Corporation.

(Code 1981, §3-4-3, enacted by Ga. L. 1987, p. 623, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1073, § 1.)

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Intoxicating Liquors, § 229 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 48 C.J.S., Intoxicating Liquors, §§ 222, 225.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 3-4-3 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 17

In the Matter of Curtis Lee Allen

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-10-15

Snippet: he was found to have violated Florida Rules 3-4.3 2 (Misconduct

In the Matter of Curtis Lee Allen

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-07-02

Snippet: matters, he was found to have violated Florida Rules 3-4.3 (Misconduct and Minor Misconduct),2 4-4.4 (a) (Respect

In THE MATTER OF DERRIC CROWTHER (Two Cases)

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-01-17

Snippet: violations of Rules 1.7, 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), 3.4, 3.5 (d), 8.1 (b), and 8.4 (a) (5), with reinstatement

De La Cruz v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-02-05

Citation: 810 S.E.2d 84

Snippet: statutory requirements listed in OCGA § 5-5-41 (c) (3), (4) 3 and (7)4 . See OCGA § 5-5-41 (6) (A) and (7) ;

State v. Riggs

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-05-01

Citation: 301 Ga. 63, 799 S.E.2d 770, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 318

Snippet: established. See, e.g., Rooney v. State, 287 Ga. 1, 3-4 (3) (690 SE2d 804) (2010). That authority is codified

Hurt v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-11-02

Citation: 298 Ga. 51, 779 S.E.2d 313, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 797

Snippet: McDonald v. State, 249 Ga. App. 1, 3-4 (3) (548 SE2d 361) (2001), the Court of Appeals concluded

Thomas v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-10-05

Citation: 297 Ga. 750, 778 S.E.2d 168, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 673

Snippet: intent.” Sears v. State, 290 Ga. 1, 3-4 (3) (717 SE2d 453) (2011). Accordingly, there is no

Cottrell v. Atlanta Development Authority, D/B/A Invest Atlanta

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16

Snippet: paragraphs (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4

COTTRELL Et Al. v. ATLANTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Et Al.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16

Citation: 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 179

Snippet: paragraphs (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4

In re Watson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-02-24

Citation: 294 Ga. 616, 755 S.E.2d 199, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 271, 2014 WL 696573, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 133

Snippet: days for his admitted violations of Rules 3-4.3, 4-1.1, 4-1.3, 4-3.2, 4-3.3 (d), 4-5.1 (a)-(c), 4-5.3 (b)-(c)

in the Matter of Marshall C. Watson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-02-24

Snippet: for his admitted violations of Rules 3- 4.3, 4-1.1, 4-1.3, 4-3.2, 4-3.3 (d), 4-5.1 (a)-(c), 4-5.3 (b)-(c)

City of Atlanta v. City of College Park

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-03-28

Citation: 292 Ga. 741, 741 S.E.2d 147, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1338, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 316

Snippet: punctuation omitted). See OCGA § 48-13-51 (a) (3), (3.4), (3.7) and (4.4). See OCGA § 48-8-111 (a) (1) (D)

Braley v. City of Forest Park

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-22

Citation: 692 S.E.2d 595, 286 Ga. 760, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 860, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 268

Snippet: a "zoning decision" as defined by OCGA § 36-66-3(4),[3] and the ordinance was not a "zoning ordinance"

In the Matter of Dogan

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-10-29

Citation: 653 S.E.2d 690, 282 Ga. 783, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3269, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 791

Snippet: concluded that Dogan violated Rules 3.3(a)(4), 3.4, 3.5(c), and 8.4(a)(4), all of the Georgia Rules of

Wimberly v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-02-07

Citation: 608 S.E.2d 625, 279 Ga. 65, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 368, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 109

Snippet: L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). [2] Majority opinion, p. 3-4. [3] Id. at 4. Indeed, none of the majority's cases

Beard v. White

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1904-08-12

Citation: 120 Ga. 1018, 48 S.E. 400, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 783

Snippet: defendant’s answer. Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (3, 4). 3-6. The parties claimed under a common grantor

Young v. Harrison

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1849-01-15

Citation: 6 Ga. 130

Snippet: 420. 1 Halsted, 1, 74. 2 Conn. R. N. S. 481, ’3, ’4. 3 Cain. R. 307, 315, 318. This, then, is the Common