Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §3-4-3, enacted by Ga. L. 1987, p. 623, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1073, § 1.)
- 45 Am. Jur. 2d, Intoxicating Liquors, § 229 et seq.
- 48 C.J.S., Intoxicating Liquors, §§ 222, 225.
Total Results: 17
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-10-15
Snippet: he was found to have violated Florida Rules 3-4.3 2 (Misconduct
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-07-02
Snippet: matters, he was found to have violated Florida Rules 3-4.3 (Misconduct and Minor Misconduct),2 4-4.4 (a) (Respect
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-01-17
Snippet: violations of Rules 1.7, 1.15 (I), 1.15 (II), 3.4, 3.5 (d), 8.1 (b), and 8.4 (a) (5), with reinstatement
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-02-05
Citation: 810 S.E.2d 84
Snippet: statutory requirements listed in OCGA § 5-5-41 (c) (3), (4) 3 and (7)4 . See OCGA § 5-5-41 (6) (A) and (7) ;
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-05-01
Citation: 301 Ga. 63, 799 S.E.2d 770, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 318
Snippet: established. See, e.g., Rooney v. State, 287 Ga. 1, 3-4 (3) (690 SE2d 804) (2010). That authority is codified
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-11-02
Citation: 298 Ga. 51, 779 S.E.2d 313, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 797
Snippet: McDonald v. State, 249 Ga. App. 1, 3-4 (3) (548 SE2d 361) (2001), the Court of Appeals concluded
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-10-05
Citation: 297 Ga. 750, 778 S.E.2d 168, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 673
Snippet: intent.” Sears v. State, 290 Ga. 1, 3-4 (3) (717 SE2d 453) (2011). Accordingly, there is no
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Snippet: paragraphs (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Citation: 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 179
Snippet: paragraphs (2.1), (2.2), (3), (3.1), (3.2), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5), (3.7), (4), (4.1), (4.2), (4.3), (4.4), (4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-02-24
Citation: 294 Ga. 616, 755 S.E.2d 199, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 271, 2014 WL 696573, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 133
Snippet: days for his admitted violations of Rules 3-4.3, 4-1.1, 4-1.3, 4-3.2, 4-3.3 (d), 4-5.1 (a)-(c), 4-5.3 (b)-(c)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-02-24
Snippet: for his admitted violations of Rules 3- 4.3, 4-1.1, 4-1.3, 4-3.2, 4-3.3 (d), 4-5.1 (a)-(c), 4-5.3 (b)-(c)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-03-28
Citation: 292 Ga. 741, 741 S.E.2d 147, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1338, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 316
Snippet: punctuation omitted). See OCGA § 48-13-51 (a) (3), (3.4), (3.7) and (4.4). See OCGA § 48-8-111 (a) (1) (D)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-22
Citation: 692 S.E.2d 595, 286 Ga. 760, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 860, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 268
Snippet: a "zoning decision" as defined by OCGA § 36-66-3(4),[3] and the ordinance was not a "zoning ordinance"
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-10-29
Citation: 653 S.E.2d 690, 282 Ga. 783, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3269, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 791
Snippet: concluded that Dogan violated Rules 3.3(a)(4), 3.4, 3.5(c), and 8.4(a)(4), all of the Georgia Rules of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-02-07
Citation: 608 S.E.2d 625, 279 Ga. 65, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 368, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 109
Snippet: L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). [2] Majority opinion, p. 3-4. [3] Id. at 4. Indeed, none of the majority's cases
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1904-08-12
Citation: 120 Ga. 1018, 48 S.E. 400, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 783
Snippet: defendant’s answer. Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (3, 4). 3-6. The parties claimed under a common grantor
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1849-01-15
Citation: 6 Ga. 130
Snippet: 420. 1 Halsted, 1, 74. 2 Conn. R. N. S. 481, ’3, ’4. 3 Cain. R. 307, 315, 318. This, then, is the Common