O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 3-4-49 (2019)

Municipalities in wet counties

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any municipality which lies wholly or partially within a county which has approved the manufacture, distribution, or package sale of distilled spirits in a county-wide referendum election as provided in this article and which, on January 1, 1985, was issuing licenses permitting the manufacture, distribution, or package sale of distilled spirits shall be authorized to exercise the powers and shall be subject to the provisions contained in this title relating to the manufacture, distribution, or package sale of distilled spirits.

History

Code 1981, § 3-4-51, enacted by Ga. L. 1986, p. 1083, § 1; Code 1981, § 3-4-51; Code 1981, § 3-4-49, as redesignated by Ga. L. 2017, p. 820, § 2/HB 485. The 2017 amendment, effective May 9, 2017, redesignated former Code Section 3-4-51 as this Code section; and in this

Code section, substituted ‘‘distribution, or package sale’’ for ‘‘sale, or distribution’’ throughout, and inserted ‘‘election’’ near the middle.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For annual survey of local government law, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 289 (1986).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: City Council of St. Marys, Georgia v. Crump, 308 S.E.2d 180 (Ga. 1983).
City Council of St. Marys, Georgia v. Crump, 308 S.E.2d 180 (Ga. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 3A-119), provide that the Revenue Commissioner cannot cancel or revoke a state license without notice and hearing, that OCGA § 3-4-49 (a) (Code Ann. § 5A-2312) permits municipalities to adopt reasonable rules and regulations “consistent with this title,” and that the St.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.