Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(9.1) Expenditures for the restructuring of or for the acquisition by stock or asset purchase, merger, consolidation, or other lawful means of an existing health care facility which is owned or operated by or on behalf of any entity described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (9) of this subsection only if such restructuring or acquisition is made by any entity described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (9) of this subsection;
(9.2) The purchase of a closing hospital or of a hospital that has been closed for no more than 12 months by a hospital in a contiguous county to repurpose the facility as a micro-hospital;
(10.1) Except as provided in paragraph (10) of this subsection, expenditures for the minor or major repair of a health care facility or a facility that is exempt from the requirements of this chapter, parts thereof or services provided or equipment used therein; or the replacement of equipment, including but not limited to CT scanners previously approved for a certificate of need;
provided, however, single specialty ambulatory surgical centers owned by physicians in the practice of ophthalmology shall not be required to comply with this subparagraph; and
Noncompliance with any condition of this paragraph shall result in a monetary penalty in the amount of the difference between the services which the center is required to provide and the amount actually provided and may be subject to revocation of its exemption status by the department for repeated failure to pay any fines or moneys due to the department or for repeated failure to produce data as required by Code Section 31-6-70 after notice to the exemption holder and a fair hearing pursuant to Chapter 13 of Title 50, the "Georgia Administrative Procedure Act." The dollar amount specified in this paragraph shall be adjusted annually by an amount calculated by multiplying such dollar amount (as adjusted for the preceding year) by the annual percentage of change in the composite index of construction material prices, or its successor or appropriate replacement index, if any, published by the United States Department of Commerce for the preceding calendar year, commencing on July 1, 2009, and on each anniversary thereafter of publication of the index. The department shall immediately institute rule-making procedures to adopt such adjusted dollar amounts. In calculating the dollar amounts of a proposed project for purposes of this paragraph, the costs of all items subject to review by this chapter and items not subject to review by this chapter associated with and simultaneously developed or proposed with the project shall be counted, except for the expenditure or commitment of or incurring an obligation for the expenditure of funds to develop certificate of need applications, studies, reports, schematics, preliminary plans and specifications or working drawings, or to acquire sites;
Noncompliance with any condition of this paragraph shall result in a monetary penalty in the amount of the difference between the services which the center is required to provide and the amount actually provided and may be subject to revocation of its exemption status by the department for repeated failure to pay any fines or moneys due to the department or for repeated failure to produce data as required by Code Section 31-6-70 after notice to the exemption holder and a fair hearing pursuant to Chapter 13 of Title 50, the "Georgia Administrative Procedure Act." The dollar amount specified in this paragraph shall be adjusted annually by an amount calculated by multiplying such dollar amount (as adjusted for the preceding year) by the annual percentage of change in the composite index of construction material prices, or its successor or appropriate replacement index, if any, published by the United States Department of Commerce for the preceding calendar year, commencing on July 1, 2009, and on each anniversary thereafter of publication of the index. The department shall immediately institute rule-making procedures to adopt such adjusted dollar amounts. In calculating the dollar amounts of a proposed project for purposes of this paragraph, the costs of all items subject to review by this chapter and items not subject to review by this chapter associated with and simultaneously developed or proposed with the project shall be counted, except for the expenditure or commitment of or incurring an obligation for the expenditure of funds to develop certificate of need applications, studies, reports, schematics, preliminary plans and specifications or working drawings, or to acquire sites;
(Code 1981, §31-6-47, enacted by Ga. L. 1983, p. 1566, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 31; Ga. L. 1989, p. 393, § 1; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1419, § 2; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1871, § 8; Ga. L. 1999, p. 296, §§ 22, 24; Ga. L. 2008, p. 9, § 2/HB 967; Ga. L. 2008, p. 12, § 1-1/SB 433; Ga. L. 2009, p. 8, § 31/SB 46; Ga. L. 2009, p. 453, § 1-24/HB 228; Ga. L. 2012, p. 337, § 1/SB 361; Ga. L. 2018, p. 132, § 5/HB 769.)
The 2012 amendment, effective July 1, 2012, substituted "a nationally recognized health care accreditation body" for "the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals" at the end of paragraph (a)(11).
The 2018 amendment, effective July 1, 2018, added paragraph (a)(9.2); and inserted ", or micro-hospital" near the middle of paragraph (a)(24).
- The amendment of this Code section by Ga. L. 2008, p. 9, § 2, irreconcilably conflicted with and was treated as superseded by Ga. L. 2008, p. 12, § 1-1. See County of Butts v. Strahan, 151 Ga. 417 (1921).
- Ga. L. 2008, p. 12, § 3-1/SB 433, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section by that Act shall only apply to applications submitted on or after July 1, 2008.
- Relocation rule of the planning agency that purported to exempt certain relocations from compliance with statutory certificate of need requirements, thereby denying opposing parties the opportunity to obtain review by the review board and the courts, was invalid as an unconstitutional attempt to exercise legislative power. HCA Health Servs. of Ga., Inc. v. Roach, 265 Ga. 501, 458 S.E.2d 118 (1995).
Mobile cardiac catherization unit which was "grandfathered" and exempt from obtaining a certificate of need when the unit began operating was required to obtain a certificate of need when the unit was relocated. Phoebe Putney Mem. Hosp. v. Roach, 267 Ga. 619, 480 S.E.2d 595 (1997).
- Healthcare provider did not show that the Department of Community Health committed an error of law in ordering the healthcare provider to cease operations until the healthcare provider obtained a certificate of need; the healthcare provider was not using replacement equipment at the time it moved and, thus, whether the Department of Community Health earlier issued a correct letter of nonreviewability was not at issue at the time the healthcare provider relocated to a new center with new equipment. N. Atlanta Scan Assocs. v. Dep't of Cmty. Health, 277 Ga. App. 583, 627 S.E.2d 67 (2006).
- Court of appeals erred in ruling that a society of surgery centers did not have to exhaust administrative remedies under the Georgia Administrative Procedure Act, O.C.G.A. § 50-13-19(a), in the society's action seeking to prevent the Georgia Department of Community Health and the Department's Commissioner from requiring the Department's members to respond to certain disputed requests in an annual survey because the futility exception to the exhaustion requirement was inapplicable; the Commissioner's position in the lawsuit did not establish futility because actions taken to defend a lawsuit could not establish futility. Ga. Dep't of Cmty. Health v. Ga. Soc'y of Ambulatory Surgery Ctrs., 290 Ga. 628, 724 S.E.2d 386 (2012).
Court of appeals erred in ruling that a society of surgery centers did not have to exhaust administrative remedies under the Georgia Administrative Procedure Act, O.C.G.A. § 50-13-19(a), in the society's action seeking to prevent the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) and the Department's Commissioner from requiring the Department's members to respond to certain disputed requests in an annual survey because the "acting outside statutory authority" exception to the exhaustion requirement did not apply; the society did not allege that DCH was acting wholly outside the Department's jurisdiction under O.C.G.A. § 31-6-70 to conduct surveys, but instead, the society claimed that the manner in which the survey was being conducted did not fully comply with the procedural requirements of the statute. Ga. Dep't of Cmty. Health v. Ga. Soc'y of Ambulatory Surgery Ctrs., 290 Ga. 628, 724 S.E.2d 386 (2012).
Because the Georgia Society of Ambulatory Surgical Centers represented the interests of members that had adequate administrative remedies, and those members had not exhausted those remedies, the trial court was required to dismiss its case alleging that an annual survey the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) issued to ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) sought information beyond the scope of O.C.G.A. § 31-6-70. Furthermore, the procedures set forth in the Georgia Administrative Procedure Act, O.C.G.A. § 50-13-19 and O.C.G.A. §§ 31-6-40(c), and31-6-47(18), and Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 111-2-2-.05(2)(e) were available to ASCs before DCH took any final adverse action against them for failing to provide the required survey information, the procedures afforded adequate administrative remedies to aggrieved ASCs. Ga. Soc'y of Ambulatory Surgery Ctrs. v. Ga. Dep't of Cmty. Health, 316 Ga. App. 433, 729 S.E.2d 565 (2012).
Cited in HCA Health Servs., Inc. v. Roach, 263 Ga. 798, 439 S.E.2d 494 (1994); Lakeview Behavioral Health Sys., LLC v. UHS Peachford, LP, 321 Ga. App. 820, 743 S.E.2d 492 (2013).
- Though an increase of the lesser of ten beds or 10 percent of bed capacity would be excluded from review generally under paragraph (a)(15) of O.C.G.A. § 31-6-47, it is likely that such increases would require a certificate of need if the new beds were used to create new institutional health services. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 83-34.
State Health Planning and Development Agency rules under former § 31-6-50 given effect under O.C.G.A. § 31-6-47. - To the extent that the exclusions in O.C.G.A. § 31-6-47 are identical to or essentially the same as those in former § 31-6-50, those State Health Planning and Development Agency (now Department of Community Health) rules in effect on June 30, 1983, as to such exclusions will remain effective on or after July 1, 1983, and until new rules are adopted. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 83-34.
Any State Health Planning and Development Agency (now Department of Community Health) rules in effect on June 30, 1983, which require a certificate of need for expenditures which increase the bed capacity of a hospital by up to ten beds or 10 percent of capacity, whichever is less, are "inconsistent with this chapter" under O.C.G.A. § 31-6-49 and therefore not controlling after July 1, 1983. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 83-34.
Total Results: 8
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-02-06
Snippet: are exempt from CON require- ments. See OCGA § 31-6-47. Health care services that predated the CON Act
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-02-27
Citation: 724 S.E.2d 386, 290 Ga. 628, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 562, 2012 WL 603247, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 206
Snippet: applicable to this case. OCGA §§ 31-6-40(c)(2), 31-6-47(a)(18). Under the APA, a person cannot seek judicial
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-05-26
Citation: 501 S.E.2d 798, 269 Ga. 540
Snippet: legislative list of CON exemptions set forth in OCGA § 31-6-47(a).[4] After this Court's second remand, SHPA adopted
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-02-17
Citation: 480 S.E.2d 595, 267 Ga. 619, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 517, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 52
Snippet: § 31-6-40(c)(1); OCGA § 31-6-40(c)(1.1); OCGA 31-6-47. Although the statute permits an exemption for
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-06-12
Citation: 265 Ga. 501, 458 S.E.2d 118
Snippet: the legislative list of exemptions pursuant to § 31-6-47 (c) and that, by promulgation of the new rule,
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-02-20
Citation: 265 Ga. 125, 453 S.E.2d 463, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 92
Snippet: which establishes a procedure pursuant to OCGA § 31-6-47 (c) by which to request a decision regarding the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-02-07
Citation: 439 S.E.2d 494, 263 Ga. 798, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 479, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 71
Snippet: requirements. OCGA §§ 31-6-40 (c) (1) and (c) (1.1); 31-6-47. The relocation of a facility such as that proposed
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1986-02-18
Citation: 341 S.E.2d 432, 255 Ga. 694, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 672
Snippet: issues presented in this appeal. Former OCGA § 31-6-47 (b), which provided, in part, that "The decision