Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, §§ 95A-503, 95A-504, enacted by Ga. L. 1973, p. 947, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 775, § 6; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1737, § 2; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1126, § 3.)
- Assessments by municipalities for street improvements, T. 36, C. 39.
Use of parking meter receipts to pay principal, interest, and other expenses of revenue bonds issued to finance public parking areas or public parking buildings, § 36-82-62.
- The Uniform Relocation System and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970, referred to in this Code section, is codified as 42 U.S.C. Ch. 61.
- For annual survey of administrative law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 31 (2004). For annual survey of local government law, see 57 Mercer L. Rev. 289 (2005).
- State law has not preempted police power authority of municipalities to regulate location and maintenance of outdoor advertising signs within their territorial jurisdictions. City of Doraville v. Turner Communications Corp., 236 Ga. 385, 223 S.E.2d 798 (1976).
City's ordinances prohibiting the use of amphibious vehicles as tour vehicles in parts of the city were not preempted by the state law giving the Public Service Commission the authority to issue certificates of public convenience and necessity; the ordinances fall within the constitutional exception to the doctrine of preemption since the General Assembly enacted general laws authorizing the local government to exercise its police powers and enact the local laws at issue. Old South Duck Tours, Inc. v. Mayor & Aldermen of Savannah, 272 Ga. 869, 535 S.E.2d 751 (2000).
- City's failure to add supplemental lighting to crossing was not actionable for negligence as O.C.G.A. § 32-4-92 provides that a municipality "may" provide lighting on any public road located within the municipality's limits, but is under no duty to provide lighting if the municipality does not choose to do so. Biggers ex rel. Key v. Southern Ry., 820 F. Supp. 1409 (N.D. Ga. 1993). but see CSX Transp., Inc. v. Trism Specialized Carriers, Inc., 9 F. Supp. 2d 1374 (N.D. Ga. 1998), aff'd, 182 F.3d 788 (11th Cir. 1999).
- Federal appellate court determined that whether an amendment to Macon, Ga., Code of Ordinances art. VII, § 18-153 that increased the annual permit fee that the City of Macon charged a telecommunications company for placement of the company's fiber optic cable on utility poles from $2.00 to $4.50 per linear foot was preempted by O.C.G.A. § 32-4-92(a)(10), or otherwise invalid because it exceeded the fees charged by the Georgia Department of Transportation for its rights of way, was an issue appropriate for resolution by the Supreme Court of Georgia through a certified question. Alltel Communs., Inc. v. City of Macon, 345 F.3d 1219 (11th Cir. 2003).
Cited in Department of Transp. v. Doss, 238 Ga. 480, 233 S.E.2d 144 (1977); Georgia Power Co. v. Collum, 176 Ga. App. 61, 334 S.E.2d 922 (1985); Murray v. Ga. DOT, 284 Ga. App. 263, 644 S.E.2d 290 (2007).
- Municipality may not, by ordinance, seek to regulate streets which are a part of the state highway system, except when the municipality is placing parking meters on or adjacent to a road which is a part of the system, and has been first authorized by the department to place such parking meters; or the municipality may also erect or maintain a traffic-control device on a road which is a part of the system, if written approval has first been obtained from the department. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U74-94.
- County may, by contract, obtain the cooperation of a municipality in the right-of-way acquisition for, and construction and maintenance of, a county road located within the municipality, but the county cannot require this of a municipality absent an appropriate contract. 1986 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U86-27.
- By establishing truck routes, a city may effectively regulate the amount of weight which may be carried on designated streets on the municipal street system. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-20.
Any city or county ordinances purporting to regulate vehicular weights must not exceed maximum weights permitted by O.C.G.A. § 32-6-26. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-20.
- Municipalities are not prohibited by Georgia's Constitution or laws from enacting ordinances regarding enforcement of traffic control devices by the use of cameras. 2000 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U2000-7.
- 40 C.J.S., Highways, § 187 et seq.
- Validity of restrictions as to points at which jitney bus passengers may be taken on and discharged, 6 A.L.R. 110.
Validity of statute or ordinance giving right of way in streets or highways to certain classes of vehicles, 38 A.L.R. 24.
Constitutionality of statute or ordinance denying right of property owners to defeat a proposed street improvement by protest, 52 A.L.R. 883.
Liability of municipal corporations and their licensees for the torts of independent contractors, 52 A.L.R. 1012.
Duty as regards barriers for protection of automobile travel, 86 A.L.R. 1389; 173 A.L.R. 626.
Personal liability of highway officers for damage to or trespass upon land in connection with construction or maintenance of highway, 90 A.L.R. 1481.
Validity, construction, and application of municipal ordinances relating to loading or unloading passengers by interurban busses on streets, 144 A.L.R. 1119.
Municipal power as to billboards and outdoor advertising, 58 A.L.R.2d 1314.
Municipality's power to permit private owner to construct building or structure overhanging or crossing the air space above public street or sidewalk, 76 A.L.R.2d 896.
Liability of private landowner for vegetation obscuring view at highway or street intersection, 69 A.L.R.4th 1092.
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-05-03
Citation: 596 S.E.2d 589, 277 Ga. 823, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1522, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 340
Snippet: ordinance in question is preempted by OCGA §§ 32-4-92(a)(10), 32-6-174, and Georgia Department of Transportation
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-10-10
Citation: 535 S.E.2d 751, 272 Ga. 869, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 3824, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 700
Snippet: roads on the municipality's street system (OCGA § 32-4-92(a)(7)); and to prohibit or regulate the use of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-03-08
Citation: 514 S.E.2d 195, 270 Ga. 770, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 945, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 258
Snippet: city to be adjacent to railroad tracks. OCGA §§ 32-4-92; 46-8-120 et seq. It is not unlawful for the City
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-05-02
Citation: 264 Ga. 205, 443 S.E.2d 469, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1512, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 394
Snippet: structure or obstruction in a public street); OCGA § 32-4-92 (a) (7) (granting power to municipality to regulate