O.C.G.A.

33-20A-6 (2019)

Financial incentive programs prohibited; capitated payment arrangement allowed

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A managed care plan may not use a financial incentive or disincentive program that directly or indirectly compensates a health care provider or hospital for ordering or providing less than medically necessary and appropriate care to his or her patients or for denying, reducing, limiting, or delaying such care. Nothing in this Code section shall be deemed to prohibit a managed care entity from using a capitated payment arrangement consistent with the intent of this Code section.

(b) A managed care plan shall make full and timely payment or reimbursement to any health care provider or hospital in the same manner and subject to the same penalties as required of insurers for group accident and sickness insurance policies under paragraph (5) of subsection (b) of Code Section 33-30-6.

History

Code 1981, § 33-20A-6, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 485, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 342, § 2; Ga. L. 1999, p. 350, § 2; Ga. L. 2000, p. 136, § 33.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 1999, p. 342, § 7, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: ‘‘This Act shall become effective on July 1, 1999, for purposes of preparing for implementation of the con-

sumer choice option and shall be applicable to any contract, policy, or other agreement of a managed care plan or health maintenance organization if such contract, policy, or agreement provides for health care services or reimbursement therefor and is issued, issued for delivery, delivered, or renewed on or after January 1, 2000.’’

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Ne. Georgia Cancer Care v. Blue Cross, 726 S.E.2d 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).
Ne. Georgia Cancer Care v. Blue Cross, 726 S.E.2d 714 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 6× “[8] OCGA §§ 33-20A-6, 33-20A-7, 33-20A-8, and 33-20A-9.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.