O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-24-41 (2019)

Discharge of insurer by payment generally

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Whenever the proceeds of or payments under a life or accident and sickness insurance policy or annuity contract become payable in accordance with the terms of the policy or contract or the exercise of any right or privilege under the policy or contract and the insurer makes payment of the proceeds or payments in accordance with the terms of the policy or contract or in accordance with any written assignment of the policy or contract, the person then designated in the policy or contract or by the assignment as being entitled to the proceeds or payments, if legally competent, shall be entitled to receive the proceeds or payments and to give full acquittance for the proceeds or payments and the payments shall fully discharge the insurer from all claims under the policy or contract unless, before payment is made, the insurer has received at its home office written notice by or on behalf of some other person that the other person claims to be entitled to the payment or some interest in the policy or contract.

History

Code 1933, § 56-2424, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For annual survey of insurance law, see 57 Mercer L. Rev. 221

(2005). For annual survey of insurance law, see 58 Mercer L. Rev. 181 (2006). For annual survey on insurance law, see 70 Mercer L. Rev. 111 (2018).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS O.C.G.A. § 33-24-41 does not apply to vehicle insurance policies. JCS Enter., Inc. v. Vanliner Ins., 227 Ga. App. 371, 489 S.E.2d 95 (1997). This section is not retroactive as to payments made prior to the statute’s effective date, to wit, January 1, 1961. Life & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Webb, 112 Ga. App. 344, 145 S.E.2d 63 (1965). Loan receipt agreement between plaintiff and tortfeasor is covenant not to sue. - Loan receipt agreement

between a plaintiff and a joint tortfeasor in exchange for a forbearance to sue is an absolute payment and not a loan; as such, the agreement constitutes a covenant not to sue and not a release. American Chain & Cable Co. v. Brunson, 157 Ga. App. 833, 278 S.E.2d 719 (1981). Applicability of § 13-4-81 only to parties with whom covenant is made. - While O.C.G.A. § 13-4-81 provides that a covenant never to sue is equivalent to a release, § 13-4-81 applies to the parties

with whom the covenant is made and not to another tortfeasor; a covenant not to sue one tortfeasor will not bar actions against another tortfeasor. American Chain & Cable Co. v. Brunson, 157 Ga. App. 833, 278 S.E.2d 719 (1981). Notice obligations. - Because O.C.G.A. § 33-24-41 clearly discharged

the insurer from liability when an individual did not notify the insurer that the individual sought the proceeds of the insurance on the individual’s father’s life, the trial court erred in denying the insurer’s motion for summary judgment. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Heveder, 274 Ga. App. 377, 618 S.E.2d 39 (2005).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 44A Am. Jur. 2d, Insurance, § 1727 et seq. C.J.S. - 46A C.J.S., Insurance, § 1978. ALR. - What rights are waived by insurer who pays money into court, 15 A.L.R. 1260. Necessity and sufficiency of tender to avoid interest on insurance premiums, 35 A.L.R. 1252. Right of court or insurer to require bond as condition of paying policy where there is not conclusive proof of insured’s death, 61 A.L.R. 824. Settlement with insurance company for less than face of valued policy as bar to recovery of difference where total loss shown, 109 A.L.R. 1485. Judgment as res judicata as to whether insured is ‘‘permanently disabled’’ within contemplation of insurance policy, 142 A.L.R. 1170. Right of insurer to restitution of payments made under mistake, 167 A.L.R. 470.

Liability of life insurer which pays proceeds of policy direct to beneficiary, for the portion of estate or succession tax attributable to such proceeds, 10 A.L.R.2d 657. Rights and remedies of insurer paying loss as against insured who has released or settled with third person responsible for loss, 51 A.L.R.2d 697. Duty of liability insurer to appeal, 69 A.L.R.2d 690. Insured’s exercise of election afforded under life insurance policy as affected by his death before complete consummation of option, 15 A.L.R.3d 1317. Liability insurer’s duty to defend action against an insured after insurer’s full performance of its payment obligations under policy, 27 A.L.R.3d 1057. Allocation of defense costs between primary and excess insurance carriers, 19 A.L.R.4th 107. Credit life insurer’s punitive damage liability for refusing payment, 55 A.L.R.4th 246.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2021 · leading case: Colonial Life & Accident Ins. v. Heveder, 618 S.E.2d 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).
Colonial Life & Accident Ins. v. Heveder, 618 S.E.2d 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 8× “It asserted that it had made payment in accordance with the terms of the policy before receiving written notice of a claim by or on behalf of Heveder or anyone other than the named beneficiary and that, pursuant to OCGA § 33-24-41, it therefore was discharged from all claims.”
JCS Enter., Inc. v. Vanliner Ins., 489 S.E.2d 95 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “Vanliner argues a different result is required by OCGA § 33-24-41, which provides in pertinent part: “Whenever the proceeds of or payments under a life or accident and sickness insurance policy or annuity contract become payable in accordance with the terms of the policy .”
Courembis Ex Rel. Est. of Courembis v. United of Omaha Life Ins., 486 F. App'x 843 (11th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 33-24-41. We agree. Georgia law provides that, once the insurer pays the person designated in the policy as being entitled to the proceeds, the insurer is discharged from all claims under the policy.”
Sarah Gayle Emery v. Guarantee Trust Life Ins. Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 12× “Under OCGA § 33-24-41, [w]henever the proceeds of or payments under a life .”
Harris v. Securian Life Ins. Co. (M.D. Ga. 2019). · cites it 3× “And like that Georgia statute, most of the cases that recognize this principle apply it when the policy designates a beneficiary by name (not by category) in the policy, and the insurer mistakenly pays that “named beneficiary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.