CopyCited 8 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 8, 1996 | 266 Ga. 249, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 161
...The State Bar may proceed against Kennedy regarding the second transaction, provided that it is not otherwise barred by Bar Rule 4-222, and so long as the Bar affords Kennedy proper notice under the Bar Rules. [5] We find no merit in Kennedy's remaining challenges to Standard 13(b) and to O.C.G.A. §
33-24-53.
CopyCited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 30, 2001 | 273 Ga. 727, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 1473
...y felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude). A plea of nolo contendere constitutes a conviction for purposes of the standard. Respondent entered a plea of nolo contendere in the State Court of Fulton County to one count of a violation of OCGA §
33-24-53(a) providing in pertinent part that [i]n a claim arising out of a motor vehicle accident, a lawyer shall not compensate or give anything of value to a person or organization to recommend or secure his employment by a client, or as a reward for having made a recommendation resulting in his employment by a client.... "Any person who violates any provision of this Code section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude." OCGA §
33-24-53(e)....
...During the grand jury investigation, Silver entered an agreement with the United States Attorney's Office in which he agreed to cooperate completely in the federal investigation and to admit the essential elements of one count of a violation of OCGA *888 §
33-24-53 in return for which he would not be prosecuted for any federal criminal offenses based on his involvement in the use of paid runners....
...der since November 1995 and that his condition had worsened to the point of his being disabled to practice law. Silver has not practiced law since May of 1999. The special master concluded that Silver's plea of nolo contendere to a violation of OCGA §
33-24-53 constituted a misdemeanor conviction involving moral turpitude in violation of Standard 66....
...d reputation from former clients, former co-workers, and lawyer acquaintances. He cooperated fully with federal authorities in their investigation and with the State Bar in its disciplinary investigation and he was punished for his violation of OCGA §
33-24-53....
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 30, 2011 | 720 S.E.2d 597
...aid to runners involving numerous cases; Respondents have not acknowledged the wrongful nature of their conduct and expressed no remorse; they have substantial experience in the practice of law; and they engaged in illegal conduct as defined by OCGA §
33-24-53 (a).
We have considered the record, the arguments of the parties, the recommendations of the special master and the Review Panel, and the relevant law....