Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §33-24-59.12, enacted by Ga. L. 2005, p. 692, § 2/SB 81; Ga. L. 2017, p. 164, § 34/HB 127.)
The 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, deleted "hospital service nonprofit corporations, nonprofit medical service corporations," following "insurance companies," near the beginning of paragraph (b)(5).
- For annual survey on insurance law, see 66 Mercer L. Rev. 93 (2014).
- Insurer's requirement that independent optometrists obtain covered materials from the insurer violated O.C.G.A. § 33-24-59.12(c)(2) because: (1) insureds were required to obtain the materials from the insurer even though O.C.G.A. § 43-30-1(2)(A) allowed the optometrists to provide this service; and (2) the subsection's intent was not merely to avoid the necessity of a physician's referral. Spectera, Inc. v. Wilson, 317 Ga. App. 64, 730 S.E.2d 699 (2012), aff'd in part, reversed in part (2013 Ga. LEXIS 899).
- Georgia Court of Appeals correctly interpreted the Patient Access to Eye Care Act, O.C.G.A.33-24-59.12(c)(2), and determined that an insurer's independent participating provider (IPP) agreements violated that section as the IPP prohibited providers from providing certain eye care, in particular the preparation of eyeglasses, directly to the insureds, therefore, the IPP agreement violated paragraph (c)(2). Spectera, Inc. v. Wilson, 294 Ga. 23, 749 S.E.2d 704 (2013).
Georgia Court of Appeals was incorrect in finding that an insurer's independent participating provider (IPP) agreement violated the Patient Access to Eye Care Act, O.C.G.A.33-24-59.12(c)(5), because the IPP agreement did not in any way create the type of impermissible discrimination between classes of licensed eye care providers contemplated by paragraph (c)(5). Spectera, Inc. v. Wilson, 294 Ga. 23, 749 S.E.2d 704 (2013).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-11-04
Citation: 294 Ga. 23, 749 S.E.2d 704, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 899
Snippet: Georgia’s Patient Access to Eye Care Act, OCGA § 33-24-59.12 (the “Act”). While the case was pending, the