O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-24-8 (2019)

Admissibility in evidence of applications in actions between insurer and insured

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As to kinds of insurance other than life insurance, no application for insurance signed by or on behalf of the insured shall be admissible in evidence in any action between the insured and the insurer arising out of the policy applied for if the insurer, at expiration of 30 days after receipt by the insurer of written demand by or on behalf of the insured for a copy of the application, has failed to furnish to the insured a copy of the application reproduced by any legible means.

History

Code 1933, § 56-2408, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Application which is basis of suit not excludable. - Insurance application which is both the gravamen of a complaint that the application did not comply with Jones v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., 156 Ga. App. 230, 274 S.E.2d 623 (1980), and the ‘‘best evidence’’ in support thereof,

cannot be the subject of a motion for exclusion at trial pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 33-24-8. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Coffman, 169 Ga. App. 192, 311 S.E.2d 854 (1983) (see O.C.G.A. § 33-34-5 and notes thereto).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 44A Am. Jur. 2d, Insurance, § 1987 et seq. ALR. - Liability in respect of premium where policy is rejected by applicant or prospect, 41 A.L.R. 644. Admissibility as against the beneficiary of life or accident insurance of statements

or declarations by the insured outside his application, 86 A.L.R. 146. Failure to attach copy of application as affecting right to set up breach of condition in policy itself, 87 A.L.R. 194. Binding effect of application not signed by insured, 91 A.L.R. 1127.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. v. Coffman, 311 S.E.2d 854 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).
Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. v. Coffman, 311 S.E.2d 854 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 6× “Appellee filed suit in the Bibb County Superior Court on March 18, 1982, and the court granted her motion, pursuant to OCGA § 33-24-8 (Code Ann. § 56-2408), that the court hold inadmissible in *193 evidence not only the application itself but all reference to it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.