Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this chapter, the term:
(Code 1981, §33-34-2, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 1608, § 1.12; Ga. L. 1997, p. 683, § 4; Ga. L. 2002, p. 512, § 1.)
- For article, "No-Fault Automobile Insurance In Georgia: Is Revision in Order?", see 27 Ga. St. B.J. 68 (1990).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former O.C.G.A. § 33-34-2, and Ga. L. 1975, p. 1207, §§ 1, 2, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Farm tractor towing a mobile home on a county road was a "motor vehicle" for purposes of the uninsured motorist statute, O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11. Hinton v. Interstate Guar. Ins. Co., 267 Ga. 516, 480 S.E.2d 842 (1997).
- When a seller had delivered possession of the automobile to the buyer and the transaction was complete as between them even though compliance had not yet been made with recording and insurance statutes, the buyer was the "owner" of the automobile, and the buyer alone, and not the seller or the seller's insurer, was liable to a third party for injuries sustained in an accident while the buyer was driving the automobile. American Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co., 149 Ga. App. 280, 253 S.E.2d 825 (1979) (decided under former Ga. L. 1975, p. 1202, §§ 1, 2).
Plan and certificate of self-insurance serves as substantial equivalent of an insurance "policy" for the purposes of O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11. Unless the plan of self-insurance submitted to the commissioner of public safety rejects the minimum uninsured motorist coverage in writing, such coverage will be implied as contained in the plan. Twyman v. Robinson, 255 Ga. 711, 342 S.E.2d 313 (1986).
"Self-insured" who complies with self-insurance law is not financially irresponsible but rather is meeting the state's required minimum, and the self-insurer does not become financially irresponsible just because it chooses the state-permitted option not to insure above the minimum. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co. v. Parnham, 182 Ga. App. 823, 357 S.E.2d 139 (1987) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 33-34-2).
Exclusion in a car rental agreement excluding liability coverage for violations of a use restriction pertaining to driving under the influence was invalid to the extent of the mandatory minimum liability coverage. Ryan v. Boyd, 911 F. Supp. 524 (M.D. Ga. 1996).
- When the insured automobile was not used to murder the victim nor was the focus of the crime, but was simply used to transport the victim to another state, the use of the vehicle was too remote and attenuated to establish the required causal nexus, such that the spouse was not entitled to a survivor's no-fault benefits. USAA Property & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Wilbur, 207 Ga. App. 57, 427 S.E.2d 49 (1993).
Cited in Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Martin, 264 Ga. 347, 444 S.E.2d 739 (1994); Hewell v. Walton County, 292 Ga. App. 510, 664 S.E.2d 875 (2008).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under Ga. L. 1974, p. 113, § 2, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Manifest legislative intent, as it appears in the definition of "self-insurer" and as a whole, is for the Department of Public Safety to certify as self-insurers only those owners who undertake to provide reparations on the same terms and conditions as an insurer. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 74-86 (decided under Ga. L. 1974, p. 113, § 2).
- Self-insurance funds for automobile liability are regulated entities for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 21-5-30.1. 1994 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 94-20.
- Motorcycle as within contract, statute, or ordinance in relation to motor cars, motor-driven cars, etc., 70 A.L.R. 1253.
Insurance against injuring property or person of third person as liability of indemnity insurance, 83 A.L.R. 677; 117 A.L.R. 239.
Trailers as affecting automobile insurance, 31 A.L.R.2d 298; 65 A.L.R.3d 804.
Meaning of "operate" or "being operated" within clause of automobile liability policy limiting its coverage, 51 A.L.R.2d 924.
Automobile insurance: when is a person "occupying" an automobile within meaning of medical payments provision, 42 A.L.R.3d 501.
What constitutes "commercial automobile" within exclusion from death or disability benefit provided by automobile policy, 66 A.L.R.3d 424.
Motorcycle as within automobile liability policy provision covering temporary or infrequent use of other automobiles, 66 A.L.R.3d 451.
Who is "named insured" within meaning of automobile insurance coverage, 91 A.L.R.3d 1280.
What constitutes "private passenger automobile" in insurance policy provisions defining risks covered or excepted, 11 A.L.R.4th 475.
Automobile insurance: what constitutes "occupying" under owned-vehicle exclusion on uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage of automobile insurance policy, 59 A.L.R.5th 191.
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-10-31
Snippet: Chamblee Visuals, LLC v. City of Chamblee, 270 Ga. 33, 34 (2) (506 SE2d 113) (1998) (“When construing the Georgia
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-02-05
Citation: 810 S.E.2d 118
Snippet: State's allegations. See Leach v. State , 259 Ga. 33, 34 (2), 376 S.E.2d 667 (1989) (rejecting the appellant's
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-27
Snippet: OCGA § 16-3-20 (6).”10 Gravitt v. State, 279 Ga. 33, 34 (2) (608 SE2d 202) (2005). See Tarvestad v. State
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-27
Citation: 296 Ga. 785, 770 S.E.2d 824, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 191
Snippet: Gravitt *792 v. State, 279 Ga. 33, 34 (2) (608 SE2d 202) (2005). See Tarvestad v
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-11-29
Citation: 290 Ga. 238, 719 S.E.2d 466, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3852, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 945
Snippet: exculpatory or impeaching.” Vega v. State, 285 Ga. 32, 33-34 (2) (673 SE2d 223) (2009) (Citation and punctuation
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-01-28
Citation: 656 S.E.2d 844, 283 Ga. 171, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 230, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 54
Snippet: 16-3-20 et seq.]" See Gravitt v. State, 279 Ga. 33, 34(2), 608 S.E.2d 202 (2005). Trial counsel testified
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-02-14
Citation: 526 S.E.2d 336, 272 Ga. 129, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 593, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 91
Snippet: Chamblee Visuals v. City of Chamblee, 270 Ga. 33, 34(2), 506 S.E.2d 113 (1998). See also Sewell v. State
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-02-24
Citation: 480 S.E.2d 842, 267 Ga. 516, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 599, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 56
Snippet: meet the definition of “motor vehicle” in OCGA § 33-34-2 (1), which Code section sets forth the type of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-06-27
Citation: 264 Ga. 347, 444 S.E.2d 739, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2214, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 473
Snippet: insured car with the permission of the owner. OCGA § 33-34-2 (5). As a result of the passage of compulsory insurance
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-05-10
Citation: 261 Ga. 227, 403 S.E.2d 802, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 211
Snippet: occupying an uninsured vehicle as provided by OCGA § 33-34-2 (5). The issue here is whether appellant is entitled
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-02-21
Citation: 401 S.E.2d 490, 261 Ga. 52, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 86
Snippet: as a vehicle within the contemplation of OCGA § 33-34-2(1) and (9), and whether the insurer may be liable
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-06-03
Citation: 368 S.E.2d 730, 258 Ga. 332, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 243
Snippet: statutory definition of "insured." (a) OCGA § 33-34-2 (5) provides: Insured means, in addition to the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-05-12
Citation: 258 Ga. 269, 367 S.E.2d 801, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 208
Snippet: under the act. For that, Allstate relied on OCGA § 33-34-2 (9) which provides in part, “ ‘(o)peration, maintenance
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-02-25
Citation: 365 S.E.2d 105, 258 Ga. 15, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 140
Snippet: vehicle" as these terms are defined in OCGA § 33-34-2. Nevertheless, OCGA § 33-34-7 (a) (1) provides
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-02-13
Citation: 352 S.E.2d 760, 256 Ga. 713, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 597
Snippet: into or alighting from the motor vehicle." OCGA § 33-34-2 (6) (8). "All policies of motor vehicle liability
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1986-11-04
Citation: 349 S.E.2d 697, 256 Ga. 493, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 888
Snippet: having more than three load-bearing wheels. OCGA § 33-34-2 (6). The statute does, however, afford protection
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1986-04-24
Citation: 342 S.E.2d 313, 255 Ga. 711, 1986 Ga. LEXIS 895
Snippet: statutes relate closely to this action. OCGA §§ 33-34-2 (12) and 40-9-101 set out the requirements for
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-09-26
Citation: 320 S.E.2d 164, 253 Ga. 328, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 927
Snippet: not an "insured" within the meaning of OCGA § 33-34-2 (5).[3] Further, OCGA § 33-34-6 (a) states, "Payments
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-09-06
Citation: 320 S.E.2d 526, 253 Ga. 269, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 897
Snippet: permission of the named insured or his spouse" OCGA § 33-34-2 (5). "`Occupying' means to be in or upon a motor
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-03-14
Citation: 313 S.E.2d 104, 252 Ga. 289, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 688
Snippet: requirements of this chapter ...." Under OCGA § 33-34-2 (12) (Code Ann. § 56-3402b) a "self-insurer" means