Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §33-41-3, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 966, § 2; Ga. L. 1989, p. 14, § 33; Ga. L. 2016, p. 825, § 1/SB 347; Ga. L. 2017, p. 682, § 2/SB 173.)
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, in subsection (a), substituted "articles of incorporation" for "charter" in the introductory paragraph; added ", except for a pure captive insurance company, which may engage in the business of accident and sickness insurance as defined in Code Section 33-7-2" at the end of paragraph (a)(1); substituted "shall not" for "may not" in paragraph (c)(1); and substituted "parent, affiliates of its parent, and its control unaffiliated business" for "parent and affiliates of its parent" in paragraph (c)(3).
The 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, substituted "formation documents" for "articles of incorporation" in the middle of subsection (a); substituted "this state" for "the state" near the end of the first sentence of subsection (b); deleted "subsection (d) of" following "provided in" in subsection (c); deleted "its" preceding "controlled unaffiliated business" near the end of paragraph (c)(3); deleted "and" from the end of paragraph (c)(5); substituted "; and" for the period at the end of paragraph (c)(6); added paragraph (c)(7); and inserted ", with prior written approval from the Commissioner," in the middle of subsection (d).
- To the extent uninsured motorist provisions are inconsistent with the Georgia Captive Insurance Company Act, O.C.G.A. § 33-4-1 et seq., those provisions would not apply to captive insurance companies as set forth in the Act, O.C.G.A. § 33-41-24, because other controlling statutory mandates and strictures may result in the insurer providing some uninsured motorist coverage without being subject to other provisions of the uninsured motorist statute; the captive insurer is not required to insure a risk that the insurer is prohibited from insuring under the Act. VFH Captive Ins. Co. v. Pleitez, 307 Ga. App. 240, 704 S.E.2d 476 (2010).
- Trial court did not err by finding that an insured was entitled to uninsured motorist coverage under the insured's policy with a captive insurer because the policy the insurer issued to the insured did not expressly include uninsured motorist coverage, and the insurer did not obtain a written rejection of that coverage from the insured; the accident involved the named insured, and the insured was engaged in responsibilities arising out of the insured's job as a taxi cab driver, not personal or family responsibilities, at the time the insured was injured. VFH Captive Ins. Co. v. Pleitez, 307 Ga. App. 240, 704 S.E.2d 476 (2010).
- There is nothing in the Georgia Captive Insurance Company Act, O.C.G.A. § 33-41-1 et seq., that explicitly prohibits a captive insurer from offering uninsured motorist coverage, and thus the Act does not directly conflict with the requirement contained in O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11 that motor vehicle liability policies must include uninsured motorist coverage unless the insured has rejected that coverage in writing, but the mandate contained in the Act, O.C.G.A. § 33-41-3(b), is explicit; uninsured motorist coverage, unless rejected in writing, is such a minimum requirement under Georgia law, and the General Assembly is presumed to have acted with full knowledge of that requirement in enacting the provisions of the Act VFH Captive Ins. Co. v. Pleitez, 307 Ga. App. 240, 704 S.E.2d 476 (2010).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-03-15
Snippet: final charge to jury); Walker v. State, 308 Ga. 33, 41 (3) (c) (838 SE2d 792) (2020) (closure of courtroom