O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-1-11.1 (2019)

Expenditure of funds for insurance and employment benefits

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The governing authority of any county is authorized to provide, and to expend county funds for the provision of, group health, life, disability, and liability insurance, retirement or pension coverage, social security and employment security coverage, and other similar or related employment benefits for members of the county governing authority and for elected county officers and the personnel thereof, as well as for the dependents and beneficiaries of such officials and personnel; provided, however, that no member of a county governing authority may become vested in the provision of any retirement or pension benefits authorized by this subsection until after the next general election in which said official stands for reelection. (b) Any prior expenditure of county funds in the manner authorized by this Code section is validated and confirmed; and no person shall be liable in any respect by reason of his or her participation in any prior provision of the benefits authorized by this Code section.

History

Code 1981, § 36-1-11.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1989, p. 1284, § 1; Ga. L.

1995, p. 924, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1258, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2006 · leading case: Malcom v. Newton Cnty., 535 S.E.2d 824 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Malcom v. Newton Cnty., 535 S.E.2d 824 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “1 This action was taken after the General Assembly enacted OCGA § 36-1-11.1 in.1989, which authorized, but did not require, county governments to include county constitutional officers in county employee pension plans.”

Morgan Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners v. Mealor, 626 S.E.2d 79 (Ga. 2006). · cites it 2× “1 OCGA §36-1-11.1. 2 OCGA § 47-14-50 (a) (providing that a portion of every fine collected for a violation of state law collected in the Superior Court is paid to the Clerk’s retirement plan).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.