Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 36-62-1 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 36-62-1 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 36-62-1

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Chapter 62 information not found

ARTICLE 2 CLERKS OF GOVERNING AUTHORITIES OF MUNICIPALITIES

36-62-1. Short title.

This chapter may be referred to as the "Development Authorities Law."

(Ga. L. 1963, p. 531, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 137, § 1.)

Law reviews.

- For article discussing industrial development bond financing under Georgia development authority law, see 14 Ga. St. B.J. 10 (1977). For article surveying developments in Georgia local government law from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 187 (1981).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Cited in Hay v. Newton County, 246 Ga. App. 44, 538 S.E.2d 181 (2000); Sherman v. Dev. Auth., 320 Ga. App. 689, 740 S.E.2d 663 (2013).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

- 62 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 1 et seq. 64 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, §§ 1279, 1280.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 36-62-1

Total Results: 5  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Dev. Auth. of DeKalb Cnty. v. State, 684 S.E.2d 856 (Ga. 2009).

Cited 20 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 28, 2009 | 286 Ga. 36, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3050

...unty voters. Finding no error in the superior court's ruling, we affirm. The case involves the impact of the War on Terrorism Local Assistance Act, OCGA § 36-75-1 et seq. ("WTLA Act"), on authorities subject to the Development Authorities Law, OCGA § 36-62-1 et seq. ("DAL"). Under the provisions of the DAL, DADC was excepted from any referendum requirement arising out of the sale or issuance of bonds. OCGA § 36-62-11....
...prior to issuing bonds for any new buildings or facilities or improvements to existing buildings or facilities," id., [1] even though DADC was previously excepted from any referendum requirement arising out of the sale or issuance of bonds under the DAL. OCGA § 36-62-11....
...IV(a) that "no local or special law shall be enacted in any case for which provision has been made by an existing general law." This argument is based on appellants' contention that OCGA § 36-75-11(c) is a special law that unconstitutionally affects an area governed by general law, namely, the DAL. See OCGA § 36-62-11....
...the statute applies generally to "[a]ny authority" that meets the criteria in subsection (c). As the trial court correctly found, OCGA § 36-75-11(c) is a general law that *860 preempted by implication the exemption from referenda set forth in OCGA § 36-62-11 as to those development authorities that meet the criteria of authorities defined in OCGA § 36-75-11(c)....
Copy

Haney v. Dev. Auth. of Bremen, 519 S.E.2d 665 (Ga. 1999).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 8, 1999 | 271 Ga. 403, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2504

...r the trial court erred in setting the bond at three million dollars based on the authority's evidence of damages and costs. [8] See OCGA § 1-3-1. [9] 1969 Ga. Laws 815, 816. [10] See Ga. Const. art. IX, sec. VI, para. III. [11] Id. [12] See OCGA §§ 36-62-1 to 36-62-13 (1993); see also Odom v....
Copy

Alexander v. MacOn-bibb Cnty. Urban Dev. Auth. & Urban Props. 47, 357 S.E.2d 62 (Ga. 1987).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 19, 1987 | 257 Ga. 181

...44495 The Development Authority of Bibb County (Authority) was created by resolution adopted in April 1973, by the Board of Commissioners *182 of Bibb County pursuant to the authority of 1976 Georgia Constitution, Art. IX, Sec. VIII, Par. II (1983 Georgia Constitution, Art. IX, Sec. VI, Par. III), and OCGA § 36-62-1 et seq., The Development Authorities Law....
Copy

Maddox v. Schrader, 492 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 17, 1997 | 268 Ga. 661, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 4159

...NOTES [1] It is undisputed that Maddox continues to reside within Henry County, albeit outside the third commission district. [2] Because Henry County's Development Authority traces its roots to a constitutional amendment found at Ga. L.1966, p. 853, the general proscriptions in the Development Authorities' Law, OCGA § 36-62-1 et seq., regarding county development authorities do not apply....
Copy

Murphy v. Pearson, 667 S.E.2d 83 (Ga. 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 22, 2008 | 284 Ga. 296, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2936

...The trial court did not err when it found appellee Arthur Pearson to be the rightful member of the IDA. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] Because the Meriwether County Industrial Development Authority was created by a constitutional amendment (Ga. L. 1967, p. 901), it is not affected by OCGA § 36-62-1 et seq., the "Development Authorities Law." See OCGA § 36-62-12....