Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 36-62-9 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 36-62-9 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 36-62-9

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Chapter 62 information not found

ARTICLE 2 CLERKS OF GOVERNING AUTHORITIES OF MUNICIPALITIES

36-62-9. Purposes of chapter; issuance of bonds or bond anticipation notes; exceptions.

The purposes of this chapter are to develop and promote trade, commerce, industry, and employment opportunities for the public good and the general welfare and to promote the general welfare of the state. No bonds or bond anticipation notes, except refunding bonds, shall be issued by an authority under this chapter unless its board of directors adopts a resolution finding that the project for which such bonds or notes are to be issued will promote the foregoing objectives and will increase or maintain employment in the territorial area of such authority. Notwithstanding the foregoing requirement:

  1. Bonds or bond anticipation notes may be issued to finance projects for air and water pollution control facilities and for sewage and solid waste disposal facilities, as provided in this chapter, without a finding that the project will increase or maintain employment, so long as the appropriate certification described in this chapter has been secured from the federal, state, or local agency having jurisdiction in the premises; and
  2. Bonds or bond anticipation notes may also be issued by an authority to finance the acquisition or development of land as the site for an industrial park as provided in this chapter without a finding that the project will increase or maintain employment if its board of directors shall adopt a resolution finding that the tract of land to be included in the project is not intended for use by a single enterprise; will be suitable primarily for use as building sites for a group of enterprises engaged in industrial, distribution, or wholesale businesses; and that either:
    1. The control and administration of the tract is to be vested in the authority or in another county or joint county and municipal development authority (or in a corporation organized under Chapter 3 of Title 14, the "Georgia Nonprofit Corporation Code") having as one of its purposes the development of trade, commerce, industry, and employment opportunities; or
    2. The uses of such tract of land are to be regulated by protective restrictions to be approved by the authority and determined by the authority to be appropriate to encourage and facilitate use thereof by business enterprises engaged in industrial, distribution, or wholesale businesses.

(Ga. L. 1963, p. 531, § 9; Ga. L. 1969, p. 137, § 7; Ga. L. 1971, p. 177, § 2; Ga. L. 1976, p. 708, § 5; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1706, §§ 5, 10; Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 27; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 36; Ga. L. 1987, p. 3, § 36.)

Cross references.

- Georgia Nonprofit Corporation Code, T. 14, C. 3.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

General Assembly has not defined "projects" to include all trade and commerce in this state. Day v. Development Auth., 248 Ga. 488, 284 S.E.2d 275 (1981).

Fact that all final blueprints and specifications were not incorporated into resolution does not require invalidation of the bonds. Alexander v. Macon-Bibb County Urban Dev. Auth. & Urban Properties #47, 257 Ga. 181, 357 S.E.2d 62 (1987).

Development authority not required to own or operate project to issue bonds.

- Proposed bond transaction did not violate Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. VI, Para. I and O.C.G.A. § 36-82-66 of the Revenue Bond Law merely because the development authority would not own or operate the proposed stadium; the development authority could use bond proceeds for paying all or part of the cost of any project (O.C.G.A. § 36-62-6(a)(13)), not only those projects the authority developed, and the authority could pay the costs of another government entity's project pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 36-62-9. Cottrell v. Atlanta Dev. Auth., 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616 (2015).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 280 et seq. 64 Am. Jur. 2d, Public Securities and Obligations, § 113 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 64A C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, §§ 2122, 2123, 2125, 2134 et seq.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 36-62-9 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 4

Cottrell v. Atlanta Development Authority, D/B/A Invest Atlanta

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16

Snippet: public good and the general welfare.” OCGA § 36-62-9. See also Youngblood, supra, 259 Ga. at 866 (2)

COTTRELL Et Al. v. ATLANTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Et Al.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16

Citation: 297 Ga. 1, 770 S.E.2d 616, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 179

Snippet: the public good and the general welfare.” OCGA § 36-62-9. See also Youngblood, supra, 259 Ga

Haney v. Development Authority of Bremen

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-07-08

Citation: 519 S.E.2d 665, 271 Ga. 403, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2504, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 659

Snippet: IX, Section VI, Paragraph III). See OCGA § 36-62-9. See OCGA § 36-62-6. Cf. Day v. Development

Alexander v. MacOn-bibb County Urban Development Authority & Urban Properties 47

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-06-19

Citation: 357 S.E.2d 62, 257 Ga. 181, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 785

Snippet: under the Development Authorities Law. 2. OCGA § 36-62-9 provides, in part, “The purposes of [the De*183velopment