O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-72-14 (2019)

Jurisdiction of superior court; expending private or public funds to mitigate harm to cemetery

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Notwithstanding any provisions of this chapter to the contrary, when any agency, authority, or political subdivision of the state seeks to file an application for a permit under this chapter, the superior court having jurisdiction over the real property wherein the cemetery or burial ground is located shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the permit application. The superior court shall conduct its investigation and determination of the permit in accordance with Code Sections 36-72-6 through 36-72-8.

(b) When activities of an agency, authority, or political subdivision of the state adversely affect an abandoned cemetery or a burial ground, such agency, authority, or political subdivision shall bear the cost of mitigating the harm to the abandoned cemetery or burial ground or reinterring the human remains as a part of the cost of the project and is authorized to expend public funds for such purpose. When activities of a private person, corporation, or other private entity adversely affect an abandoned cemetery or a burial ground, such person, corporation, or other entity shall bear the cost of mitigating the harm to the cemetery or burial ground or reinterring the human remains. The cost of mitigating the harm to an abandoned cemetery or to a burial ground or reinterring the human remains exposed through vandalism by an unidentified vandal or through erosion may be borne by the governing authority in whose jurisdiction the abandoned cemetery or burial ground is located.

(c) The provisions of this chapter notwithstanding, the Department of Transportation shall not be required to obtain a permit under this chapter unless human remains are to be relocated; provided, however, that the department shall be required to obtain an archaeologist’s report, pursuant to paragraph (2) of Code Section 36-72-5, confirming the absence of human remains on the affected property.

History

Code 1981, § 36-72-14, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 924, § 3; Ga. L. 2011, p. 583, § 11/HB 137.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2018 · leading case: In Re Application of the City of Barnesville (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Application of the City of Barnesville (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 36-72-14 (a) (“the superior court having jurisdiction over the real property wherein the cemetery or burial ground is located shall have exclusive jurisdiction over [a] permit application” filed by “any agency, authority, or political subdivision of the state”).”
Atilano v. Bd. of Commissioners, 541 S.E.2d 385 (Ga. 2001). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 36-72-14 (a). Of nine known descendants, the appellant is the only one who opposes the trial court’s ruling.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.