O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 36-9-5 (2019)

Erection, repair, and furnishing of county buildings; storage of county documents

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) It is the duty of the county governing authorities to erect or repair, when necessary, their respective courthouses and jails and all other necessary county buildings and to furnish each with all the furniture necessary for the different rooms, offices, or cells. (b) The county buildings shall be erected and kept in order and repaired at the expense of the county under the direction of the county governing authority which is authorized to make all necessary contracts for that purpose. (c)(1) As used in this subsection, the term ‘‘county document’’ means: (A) Records documenting property rights, deeds, and wills; and (B) Tax records documenting ownership of property and the latest valuations of property.

(2) A county officer, the county board of tax assessors, or any other officer of the county having the responsibility or custody of any county documents set forth in paragraph (1) of this subsection shall, at night or when the county office is closed, keep such county documents: (A) In a fireproof safe or vault; (B) In fireproof cabinets; (C) On microfilm, pursuant to the standards set forth in Article 6 of Chapter 18 of Title 50, only if a security copy has been sent to the Georgia State Archives; (D) At a location not more than 100 miles from the county in a data storage and retrieval facility approved by the county governing authority within the State of Georgia which is in a building or facility which is in compliance with the fire safety standards applicable to archives and record centers as established by the National Fire Protection Association in Standard No. 232, as such standard was adopted on August 11, 1995. If documents are stored outside the county where the documents were created, the government entity shall bear all costs of transporting such documents back to the county of origin for purposes of responding to requests under Article 4 of Chapter 18 of Title 50, relating to inspections of public records. Such documents shall be made available to the requester; or (E) On any other electronic imaging medium that facilitates retrieval of such documents via electronic means, provided that such medium enables conversion of such documents to future electronic imaging technologies and provided that such custodian creates a daily computer-based backup of all archival documents stored on such medium. (3) It is the duty of the county governing authorities to furnish the necessary fireproof equipment, microfilming equipment and supplies, or some other safe facility for such county documents. (4) On and after January 1, 1985, county documents shall be stored only in accordance with the provisions of this subsection. The local fire marshal in each county shall monitor the various county offices in the county to assure compliance with the provisions of this subsection.

History

Laws 1796, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 182; Code 1863, §§ 468, 469; Code 1868, §§ 530, 531; Code 1873, §§ 496, 497; Code 1882, §§ 496, 497; Civil Code 1895, §§ 351, 352; Civil Code 1910,

§§ 399, 400; Code 1933, §§ 91-701, 91-702; Ga. L. 1983, p. 653, § 2; Ga. L. 1997, p. 925, § 3; Ga. L. 2012, p. 173, § 1-32/HB 665.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For survey article on

local government law, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 285 (2007) and 60 Mercer L. Rev. 263 (2008). JUDICIAL DECISIONS Authority exclusively granted to county. - Authority granted under O.C.G.A. § 36-9-5(a) is given exclusively to the county and is not shared with the city. Therefore, the county does not need the city’s approval before condemning property within the city limits when, as here, the condemnation is reasonably necessary to provide a public service. Brunswick Landing, LLC v. Glynn County, 301 Ga. App. 288, 687 S.E.2d 271 (2009), cert. denied, No. S10C0558, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 246 (Ga. 2010). Power of commissioners. - County commissioners with power to levy and tax also have the power to act. Dunn v. O’Neill, 144 Ga. 823, 88 S.E. 190 (1916). Authority to levy tax. - Ordinary (now judge of the probate court) had the power to levy an extra tax to carry into effect the provisions of this section, without the recommendation of the grand jury, but the order levying such extra tax should clearly and distinctly state the object and purpose for which the tax is levied. Barlow v. Ordinary of Sumter County, 47 Ga. 639 (1873). Discretion of county officers. - Necessities of the various counties in regard to these matters are to be determined by the peculiar conditions surrounding each county; and, therefore, the sound judgment of the county authorities in each case must be relied upon to provide the public with proper buildings on the one hand, and to protect the taxpayer from useless and unnecessary burdens in regard to such matters on the other. Commissioners of Habersham County v. Porter Mfg. Co., 103 Ga. 613, 30 S.E. 547 (1898). Authority to build courthouse. - Local Act giving board of commissioners jurisdiction over county matters authorizes the board of commissioners to contract for building of county courthouse. Matthews v. Hussey, 148 Ga. 526, 97 S.E. 437 (1918). Officers having jurisdiction of county affairs are not deprived of all

discretion as to the manner of providing a courthouse or the character of the building or the building’s equipment. On that subject the county authorities have broad discretion, which should not be disturbed by the courts except cautiously, nor unless it is clear and manifest that the county authorities are abusing the discretion vested in the authorities by law. Manry v. Gleaton, 164 Ga. 402, 138 S.E. 777 (1927); Cowart v. Manry, 166 Ga. 612, 144 S.E. 21 (1928). Power to donate to chamber of commerce. - When the applicable revenue statutes were construed together with Ga. Const. 1877, Art. VII, Sec. XVI, Paras. I and II and Art. VII, Sec. VI, Para. II and Art. IX, Sec. V, Para. I (see now Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. VI, Para. VI and Art. IX, Sec. IV), it was held that the statutes did not confer power or authority on a county board of commissioners to donate county funds derived from taxation or from other sources to a chamber of commerce, freight bureau, or convention and tourist bureau even if such donations were intended to accomplish a lawful purpose. Atlanta Chamber of Commerce v. McRae, 174 Ga. 590, 163 S.E. 701 (1932). Sheriff had power to modify county-owned property within exclusive use. - County sheriff had the independent authority to repaint and remark county-owned sheriff ’s vehicles assigned to the sheriff ’s exclusive use, but lacked the authority to modify portions of a county-owned building in which the sheriff ’s office and jail were housed, as the facility was shared with the superior, state, and magistrate courts of Clayton County, as well as the clerks of those courts, the solicitor general, and the district attorney, and hence, not under the sheriff ’s exclusive use. As a result, subject to compliance with O.C.G.A. § 40-8-91, summary judgment in favor of the county as to the extent of the sheriff ’s authority was reversed as to the former, but affirmed as to the latter. Hill v. Clayton

County Bd. of Comm’rs, 283 Ga. App. 15, 640 S.E.2d 638 (2006), overruled on other grounds, Mayor & Aldermen of Savannah v. Batson-Cook Co., 291 Ga. 114, 728 S.E.2d 189 (Ga. 2012). County was authorized to exercise the county’s right of eminent domain in connection with the expansion of a detention center because the county had jurisdiction over the maintenance of jails in the county under O.C.G.A. § 36-9-5(a), the operation of a jail constituted a public purpose pursuant to Ga. Const. 1983, Art. IX, Sec. II, Para. V, and the property owner did not identify any general law limiting the right of the

county to exercise the county’s power of eminent domain. Brunswick Landing, LLC v. Glynn County, 301 Ga. App. 288, 687 S.E.2d 271 (2009), cert. denied, No. S10C0558, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 246 (Ga. 2010). Cited in Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. Tidwell, 173 Ga. 499, 160 S.E. 620 (1931); Turner v. Johnston, 183 Ga. 176, 187 S.E. 864 (1936); Jackson v. Gasses, 230 Ga. 712, 198 S.E.2d 657 (1973); Wheeler v. DeKalb County, 249 Ga. 678, 292 S.E.2d 855 (1982); Manders v. Lee, 338 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2003); Lawson v. Lincoln County, 292 Ga. App. 527, 664 S.E.2d 900 (2008).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Judges’ and clerks’ offices at courthouse. - Judges of the probate courts and clerks of the superior courts, being constitutional county officers, have a right to maintain their offices in the county courthouse, unless special circumstances make it impractical for judges and clerks to be located there. 1978 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 78-15. Office of county school superintendent is not required to be located in county courthouse. 1965-66 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 66-31.

Storage of records at home. - It is not proper for a county tax commissioner to store tax records in the commissioner’s home. 1975 Op. Att’y Gen. No. U75-75. Unauthorized poll. - In the absence of any statutory authority, the board of commissioners would not be authorized to expend county funds to conduct an election in the nature of a ‘‘straw vote’’ or public opinion poll to determine whether to construct a new county building. 1968 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 68-70.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 56 Am. Jur. 2d, Municipal Corporations, Counties, and Other Political Subdivisions, § 478 et seq. C.J.S. - 20 C.J.S., Counties, § 221.

ALR. - Applicability of municipal building regulation to state or county buildings, 31 A.L.R. 450.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2021 · leading case: Brunswick Landing, LLC v. Glynn Cnty., 687 S.E.2d 271 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).
Brunswick Landing, LLC v. Glynn Cnty., 687 S.E.2d 271 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 8× “Under OCGA § 36-9-5 (a), 5 Glynn County has jurisdiction over the maintenance of jails in the county.”
Micheal Leslie Lake v. Michael Skelton, 871 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. 2017). · cites it 4× “And although Georgia law requires that counties “erect” and “repair” the county jail, Ga. Code Ann. § 36-9-5 (a), we explained in Manders that “the location where the sheriff’s policing function is performed does not automatically transmute the function into a state function or…”
Felicia Pellitteri v. Sheriff Chris Prine, 776 F.3d 777 (11th Cir. 2015). “(citing O.C.G.A. §§ 36-9-5, 42-5-2(a), 15-16-20, 45-4-7).”
Lawson v. Lincoln Cnty., 664 S.E.2d 900 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “A county also has the duty to maintain and furnish the jail, OCGA § 36-9-5 (a) and (b), and “to maintain the inmate, furnishing him food, clothing, and any needed medical and hospital attention.”
Hill v. Clayton Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 640 S.E.2d 638 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, “county buildings shall be erected and kept in order and repaired at the expense of the county under the direction of the county governing authority which is authorized to make all necessary contracts for that purpose.”
Oqueshia Andrews v. Carmel Biggers, Jr., 996 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2021). “For these reasons, Manders erred in concluding that the control factor favors a finding of immunity. C. The third factor requires us to account for where the entity or official derives funds.”
Manders v. Lee, 285 F.3d 983 (11th Cir. 2002). “” O.C.G.A. § 36-9-5. The county board’s role in maintaining the jail structure itself, however, has no impact on the sheriffs law enforcement policies as to use of force or on his training, hiring, supervision, or discipline of his deputies.”
Bunyon v. Burke Cnty., 306 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (S.D. Ga. 2004). · cites it 2× “at 1323 (citing O.C.G.A. §§ 36-9-5, 42-5-2(a), 15-16-20, 45-4-7.”
Willie Santonio Manders v. Thurman Lee, 338 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2002). · cites it 3× “O.C.G.A. §§ 36-9-5, 42-5-2(a), 15-16-20, 45-4-7.”
Micheal Leslie Lake v. Michael Skelton (11th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “And although Georgia law requires that counties “erect” and “repair” the county jail, Ga. Code Ann. § 36-9-5 (a), we explained in Manders that “the location where the sheriff’s policing function is performed does not automatically transmute the function into a state function or…”
Moncus v. Lasalle Mgmt. Co., LLC d/b/a Lasalle Corr. (M.D. Ga. 2020). · cites it 2× “, O.C.G.A. §§ 36-9-5(a), 15-16-20. The county also funds the sheriff’s budget.”
— 36-9-5(a) — 4 cases
Micheal Leslie Lake v. Michael Skelton, 871 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. 2017). “And although Georgia law requires that counties “erect” and “repair” the county jail, Ga. Code Ann. § 36-9-5 (a), we explained in Manders that “the location where the sheriff’s policing function is performed does not automatically transmute the function into a state function or…”
Oqueshia Andrews v. Carmel Biggers, Jr., 996 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2021). “For these reasons, Manders erred in concluding that the control factor favors a finding of immunity. C. The third factor requires us to account for where the entity or official derives funds.”
Moncus v. Lasalle Mgmt. Co., LLC d/b/a Lasalle Corr. (M.D. Ga. 2020). “, O.C.G.A. §§ 36-9-5(a), 15-16-20. The county also funds the sheriff’s budget.”
Micheal Leslie Lake v. Michael Skelton (11th Cir. 2017). “And although Georgia law requires that counties “erect” and “repair” the county jail, Ga. Code Ann. § 36-9-5 (a), we explained in Manders that “the location where the sheriff’s policing function is performed does not automatically transmute the function into a state function or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.