Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 40-1-3 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 40 MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC

Section 1. Identification and Regulation, 40-1-1 through 40-1-200.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

40-1-3. Requiring or permitting unlawful operation of vehicle.

It is unlawful for the owner or any other person employing or otherwise directing the driver of any vehicle to require or knowingly permit the operation of such vehicle upon a highway in any manner contrary to law.

(Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 556, § 122; Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 1.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Editor's notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1910, § 1770(1), are included in the annotations for this Code section.

"Automobile" defined.

- Term "automobile" has a definite popular significance and is understood to refer to a wheeled vehicle, propelled by gasoline, steam, or electricity, and used for the transportation of persons or merchandise. Carter v. State, 12 Ga. App. 430, 78 S.E. 205 (1913) (decided under former Code 1910, § 1770(1)).

Words, "propelled by steam, gas, gasoline, electricity, or any other power than muscular," referred to the phrase "any other vehicle," and not to the word "automobile." Carter v. State, 12 Ga. App. 430, 78 S.E. 205 (1913) (decided under former Code 1910, § 1770(1)).

Former Code 1910, § 1770 included a motorcycle propelled by gasoline. Bonds v. State, 16 Ga. App. 401, 85 S.E. 629 (1915) (decided under former Code 1910, § 1770(1)).

Use of intoximeter results obtained from driver.

- If the state wants to prosecute a party who allowed an intoxicated driver to operate an automobile in violation of the statute governing driving under the influence, the state can use the intoximeter results obtained from the accused operator only if the state can prove that the state's evidence meets the statutory requirements for admissibility under O.C.G.A. § 40-6-392. Munda v. State, 172 Ga. App. 857, 324 S.E.2d 799 (1984).

Standing to contest admissibility of intoximeter test.

- Person charged with permitting another person to operate an automobile contrary to the law governing driving under the influence has standing to contest the admissibility of an intoximeter test under the statute governing the introduction of such evidence. Munda v. State, 172 Ga. App. 857, 324 S.E.2d 799 (1984).

Cited in Beck v. Wade, 100 Ga. App. 79, 110 S.E.2d 43 (1959); Borochoff v. Russell, 108 Ga. App. 266, 132 S.E.2d 861 (1963).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Unsafe bus on highways for purpose other than repairs.

- Once a school bus has been declared unsafe, a misdemeanor citation may be issued each time the bus is found moving on the highways for purposes other than effecting the requisite repairs. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 74-31.

Issuance of citation to persons other than driver of unsafe vehicle.

- Citations may be issued not only to the driver of an unsafe vehicle, but also to any person who knew the vehicle to be in an unsafe condition and yet ordered or directed the driver to take the vehicle upon the highways, and to the owner of the vehicle if the owner knew of the unsafe condition and yet permitted continued operation of the vehicle. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 74-31.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 7A Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, §§ 223, 236, 268, 285, 286.

C.J.S.

- 61A C.J.S., Motor Vehicles, §§ 1504 et seq., 1639, 1640, 1751 et seq.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 40-1-3 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 3

Grant v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-02-18

Citation: 824 S.E.2d 255, 305 Ga. 170

Snippet: **172Fourteenth Amendment2 , and OCGA § 15-12-40.1.3 We disagree. To challenge the composition of a

American Lien Fund, LLC v. Dixon

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-01

Citation: 690 S.E.2d 415, 286 Ga. 562, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 535, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 178

Snippet: advancing this argument, ALF looks to OCGA § 48-4-40(1),[3] which sets an initial period of 12 months from

Westmoreland v. Tallent

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-07-05

Citation: 549 S.E.2d 113, 274 Ga. 172, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 568

Snippet: revised probate code carries over former OCGA § 53-2-40.1. [3] However, similar issues have been addressed